Abstract

The paper introduces Schmidt's game and proves the permanence and dimension properties used by the later winning-set argument for systems of linear forms.

Role in dependence graphs

Proof-critical source

On Some Properties of Irrational Subspaces

This paper is included only for the following marked statement:

  • Schmidt-game theorems · winning-set construction and permanence resultsIntroduces the game machinery used in the 1969 winning proof.

Proof-critical source

On Nontrivial Winning and Losing Parameters of Schmidt Games

This paper is included only for the following marked statements:

  • Lemma 8 · printed p. 182Monotonicity along a fixed product alpha beta: decreasing Alice's parameter preserves winning.
  • Theorem 7 · §13, printed pp. 198–199Every winning set has a positional winning strategy.
  • Corollary 1 of Theorem 6 · §§11–12, printed pp. 194–197The Hausdorff-dimension lower bound for an (alpha,beta)-winning set used contrapositively in v3 Proposition 2.3.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against the exact journal version of record

Not a correctness certificate. These reports do not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Exact reviewed source

Version of record · Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 123(1), 178–199 (1966)

Wolfgang M. Schmidt. On badly approximable numbers and certain games. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 123(1), 178–199 (1966).

Open audited source ↗
Generated August 23, 2026
01Statements4 reported findingsCorrect

The permanence results for winning sets, the winning property and winning dimension of badly approximable numbers, the digit-expansion examples, the Hausdorff-dimension bounds, and the positional-strategy theorem are correct. One mechanical contraction-parameter typo in the proof of the countable-intersection theorem does not alter its statement.

Theorems 1–3Correct

Local-isometry invariance, countable intersections, and badly approximable numbers

Journal pages 184–189 · Theorems 1–3 and their proofs · version of record

The local-isometry argument transfers a winning strategy after the required strict parameter shrinkage α<α\alpha'<\alpha with αβ=αβ\alpha'\beta'=\alpha\beta. The scheduled-subsequence construction proves that countable intersections of α\alpha-winning sets remain α\alpha-winning after the contraction parameter is corrected as recorded under Proofs. The rational-avoidance strategy proves that badly approximable numbers are (α,β)(\alpha,\beta)-winning whenever 2α<1+αβ2\alpha<1+\alpha\beta, and the obstruction for α>1/2\alpha>1/2 gives winning dimension exactly 1/21/2.

Transactions version-of-record scan
Theorems 4 and 5Correct

The base-expansion winning-dimension examples

Journal pages 189–194 · Theorems 4–5 and proofs · version of record

The scale-window strategy excludes a prescribed digit at infinitely many positions and therefore establishes the stated winning property for numbers that are not normal to a fixed base. The complementary construction for numbers with infinitely many zero digits supplies both the winning lower bound and an explicit Black strategy above αg=((g1)2+1)1\alpha_g=((g-1)^2+1)^{-1}, proving the exact winning dimension.

Transactions version-of-record scan
Theorem 6Correct

The branching condition yields the stated Hausdorff-dimension lower bound

Journal pages 194–197 · Theorem 6, Lemmas 20–22, and proof · version of record

The hypotheses create an mm-ary tree of legal strategy chains whose level-kk balls have radius (αβ)kt(\alpha\beta)^{kt} and pairwise disjoint interiors. Lemma 20 bounds by two the number of level balls met by a sufficiently small covering ball. Mapping branches to base-mm expansions then gives Hausdorff dimension at least logm/(tlog(αβ))\log m/(t|\log(\alpha\beta)|). The Euclidean and Hilbert-space corollaries follow from the available branching counts.

Transactions version-of-record scan
Theorem 7Correct

Every winning set admits a positional winning strategy

Journal pages 198–199 · Theorem 7 and proof · version of record

The well-order construction assigns to each current move a canonical compatible history. If the construction reaches a terminal alternative, the current ball is already contained in the target; otherwise the canonical prefixes extracted from any purported losing play form an infinite chain for the original winning strategy. In both cases the positional strategy forces the intersection into the target set.

Transactions version-of-record scan
02Proofs5 reported findingsCorrect

The central proofs are correct and complete after one uniquely determined typographical correction in the effective contraction parameter used to interleave countably many strategies.

Theorem 1Correct and complete

Uniform local distortion estimates transfer every legal selected move

Journal pages 184–186 · Lemma 10 and proof of Theorem 1 · version of record

Compactness supplies uniform continuity and positive lower bounds for the local metric multiplier. After entering a sufficiently small ball, the two inclusions in Lemma 10 make the pulled-back and pushed-forward balls legal with parameters α=α(1ε)2\alpha'=\alpha(1-\varepsilon)^2 and β=β(1ε)2\beta'=\beta(1-\varepsilon)^{-2}. Radii tend to zero, so the unique outcome in the target space is the image of the outcome governed by the original winning strategy.

Transactions version-of-record scan
Proof of Theorem 2Typo

The induced Black contraction begins with β\beta, not α\alpha

Journal page 187 · proof of Theorem 2, three occurrences of the induced parameter · version of record

For the strategy assigned to SS_\ell, successive selected Black moves are 22^\ell rounds apart. Relative to the preceding selected White move, the actual contraction is β(αβ)21\beta(\alpha\beta)^{2^\ell-1}. The page instead prints α(βα)21\alpha(\beta\alpha)^{2^\ell-1}, including the special cases αβα\alpha\beta\alpha and α(βα)3\alpha(\beta\alpha)^3. Replace the initial α\alpha by β\beta in all three occurrences. Each SS_\ell is α\alpha-winning for every Black parameter, so the corrected parameter supplies the required strategy; the displayed subsequence is then a legal play and its outcome lies in every SS_\ell. Repair classification: Verified repair. The theorem and its corollary are unchanged.

Transactions version-of-record scan
Proof of Theorem 3Correct and complete

The rational-separation induction checks all denominator blocks

Journal pages 188–189 · Lemma 15 and proof of the Proposition · version of record

The choice αβγ/2(αβ)t<γ/2\alpha\beta\gamma/2\leq(\alpha\beta)^t<\gamma/2, where γ=1+αβ2α\gamma=1+\alpha\beta-2\alpha, synchronizes the game scale with denominator blocks. Distinct reduced fractions in one block cannot both be dangerous in the current ball, and Lemma 15 moves the next selected ball past the single possible danger interval. Induction over the blocks yields a uniform lower bound xp/q>δq2|x-p/q|>\delta q^{-2} for every rational p/qp/q.

Transactions version-of-record scan
Proofs of Theorems 4–6Correct and complete

The digit-window and branching constructions preserve the required scales

Journal pages 189–197 · Sections 8–12 · version of record

For Theorems 4–5, the selected digit positions are separated far enough that only one forbidden cylinder meets the current interval, while the losing strategy repeats a fixed block containing no zero. For Theorem 6, Lemmas 20–22 provide the separation and tree structure needed for the covering estimate. The endpoint choices, radius multipliers, and dimension exponents agree throughout the constructions.

Transactions version-of-record scan
Proof of Theorem 7Correct and complete

The canonical-history construction exhausts all positional plays

Journal pages 198–199 · proof of Theorem 7 · version of record

The well-ordering selects compatible least predecessors. The finite-chain compactness step constructs an infinite original-strategy chain whenever canonical prefixes continue indefinitely. Applied to a play of the positional strategy, either a current ball is already contained in the target or the extracted chain has target-contained intersection; both alternatives prove the required winning property.

Transactions version-of-record scan
03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, exact locations, and sources checked.
Open report PDF ↗