Role in dependence graphs

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against the exact journal version of record

Not a correctness certificate. These reports do not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Exact reviewed source

Cambridge version of record · Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 2 (1982), 203–219

François Ledrappier and Jean-Marie Strelcyn. A proof of the estimation from below in Pesin's entropy formula. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 2 (1982), 203–219.

Open audited source ↗
Generated August 28, 2026
01Statements1 reported findingNo statement issues found

Proposition 3.1 constructs the measurable increasing partition subordinate to unstable disks that Ledrappier–Young reuses.

Proposition 3.1No issue found

A measurable partition can be made increasing and subordinate to global unstable leaves

Version of record pp. 210–216 · Proposition 3.1, Proposition 3.3, and §§ 3.4–3.5

Under the full-positive-unstable-dimension hypothesis, Proposition 3.1 produces an increasing measurable partition whose atoms contain neighborhoods inside global unstable leaves, exhaust those leaves under backward iterates, generate the ambient sigma-algebra, and admit measurable leaf volume. Ledrappier–Young's Lemma 3.1.1 explicitly reuses this disk-family construction for its subordinate partition.

02Proofs2 reported findingsNo proof issues found

The measurable-partition argument is complete once the explicitly cited invariant-manifold chapter is treated as a terminal monograph source.

Proposition 3.1 proofCorrect and complete with explicit imported input

The local-disk family yields subordination, exhaustion, and generation

Version of record pp. 211–216 · Propositions 3.2–3.3 and §§ 3.4–3.5

Proposition 3.2 supplies the radius-selection estimate. Proposition 3.3 gives uniform closed regular blocks and continuous local unstable disks. Sections 3.4–3.5 choose an admissible radius, form the leafwise partition, prove local subordination using contraction and Borel–Cantelli, establish exhaustion and separation under iterates, and extend the construction across countably many invariant components. The deductions from Proposition 3.3 are coherent.

Terminal source boundaryClosed at published-book terminals

The regular disk family comes from Katok–Strelcyn's invariant-manifold monograph chapter

Version of record p. 212 · Proposition 3.3 cites §§ 6–7 of Katok–Strelcyn's 1980 preprint; published form: Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1222 (1986), pp. 1–40, DOI 10.1007/BFb0099032

The paper explicitly derives Proposition 3.3 from the results and proofs of §§ 6–7 of the cited preprint, later published as the Part I invariant-manifold chapter in Katok–Strelcyn's Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1222. That exact chapter is a terminal monograph source for this graph. The remaining entropy theorem, Hopf argument, and other cited papers are not required for the selected disk-family construction.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo novelty concerns found

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, exact locations, and sources checked.
Open report PDF ↗