arXiv:math/0210349v1

Metric Diophantine approximation: The Khintchine--Groshev theorem for non-degenerate manifolds

V. Beresnevich, V. Bernik, D. Kleinbock, G. A. Margulis

math.NT11J8311K60

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to prove a Khintchine type theorem for divergence for linear Diophantine approximation on non-degenerate manifolds, which completes earlier results for convergence.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v1

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 19, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsCorrect

The divergence Khintchine--Groshev theorem for nondegenerate manifolds is correct under the paper's monotonicity convention.

Theorem 1.6Correct

Nondegenerate manifolds are of Groshev type for divergence

Page 4 and Section 5 (pages 16--17) · main theorem and final proof · arXiv:math/0210349v1

Local nondegeneracy yields a ball on which sufficiently many integer coefficient vectors have gradients and values in the controlled ranges supplied by the effective upper-bound theorem. Those coefficient vectors define resonant hypersurfaces forming a regular system. The regular-system divergence theorem then gives full measure whenever hψ(h)\sum_h\psi(h) diverges, and a countable cover of the nondegenerate parameter set proves the global assertion.

Regular-system reductionCorrect

The resonant-set formulation has the required counting and separation

Sections 3--5 (pages 7--17) · Theorems 3.2 and 4.1 and proof of Theorem 1.6 · arXiv:math/0210349v1

The construction selects coefficient vectors in a dyadic height window, obtains a uniform lower derivative, and uses the implicit-function estimate to compare distance to a resonant set with the small linear-form value. The counting lower bound and mutual separation are at the exact scale required by the regular-system theorem, while discarded boundary balls have asymptotically negligible measure.

02Proofs2 reported findingsCorrect

The effective upper bounds, regular-system construction, approximation-by-resonances lemma, and final covering argument are correct and complete.

Section 2Correct and complete

The effective upper-bound inputs cover every derivative regime

Pages 4--6 · Theorems 2.1--2.3 · arXiv:math/0210349v1

The proof partitions integer linear forms according to gradient size and applies the cited quantitative nondivergence estimate only after verifying smoothness, nondegeneracy, and the uniform lower bound. The complementary large-gradient regime is controlled by a direct derivative argument. Their exceptional-set bounds are summable at the chosen scales.

Sections 3--5Correct and complete

The ubiquity argument implies full measure locally and globally

Pages 7--17 · Theorems 3.2 and 4.1 and proof of Theorem 1.6 · arXiv:math/0210349v1

The regular-system theorem converts divergence of the original series to almost-everywhere infinitely many resonant approximations. The distance-to-resonance estimate converts each such approximation back to the paper's linear Diophantine inequality with only fixed constants; monotonicity absorbs those constants. Exhausting the domain by admissible balls completes the proof.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:math/0210349v1
Authors listed
V. Beresnevich, V. Bernik, D. Kleinbock, G. A. Margulis
Audit date
August 19, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.