Abstract

We establish a uniform two-dimensional local limit theorem for the joint distribution of Ω(n)Ω(n) and Ω(n+1)Ω(n+1). More precisely, along a set of scales of logarithmic density one, the normalized joint counts are uniformly approximated by the density of two independent Gaussian random variables, each with mean and variance log⁡log⁡x\log\log x, up to a power-saving error. The proof builds upon a recent circle-method framework of Tao and Teräväinen. Our results equally hold for the additive function ωω. Additionally, we explore applications of our local limit theorem in the setting of uniquely ergodic systems.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v1

Not a correctness certificate. A green “no issues found” result may include yellow suspected typos or minor formal issues that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated October 23, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsNo statement issues found

The joint local limit theorem for the two prime-divisor counting functions and its uniquely ergodic consequences are supported in the stated logarithmic-density sense.

Theorem 1.1No issue found

The bivariate local limit theorem has the claimed uniformity

PDF pp. 2–5 and 9–31 · arXiv:2610.28328v1

The high-frequency range is controlled by the Tao–Teräväinen input, while the sieve transfer couples the arithmetic functions to an independent prime model. The bivariate characteristic-function expansion and smoothing argument are uniform in the two lattice coordinates and in all four ω/Ω\omega/\Omega choices. The exceptional scales have logarithmic density zero as stated.

Theorem 1.2No issue found

The dynamical consequences follow from total-variation control

PDF pp. 5–7 and 31–34 · arXiv:2610.28328v1

The local limit theorem gives total-variation approximation by the product Gaussian lattice law on the relevant windows. Unique ergodicity controls the resulting averages uniformly in the base point, and the tails are negligible by the established moment bounds.

02Proofs2 reported findingsNo proof issues found

The dyadic reduction, sieve coupling, random-model local limit theorem, truncation, smoothing, and dynamical transfer arguments are correct and complete.

Sections 3–4No issue found in the reviewed proof

The arithmetic functions are transferred to one common random model

PDF pp. 9–26 · arXiv:2610.28328v1

The dyadic selection uses one common scale XX, and the fundamental-lemma error is uniform in both coordinates. Proposition 4.6 correctly couples the ω\omega and Ω\Omega variants, including repeated prime powers, before the two-dimensional characteristic-function estimate is applied.

Theorem 4.8 and Section 5No issue found in the reviewed proof

Fourier inversion and smoothing recover the full local statement

PDF pp. 26–34 · arXiv:2610.28328v1

The small-frequency Taylor expansion has the required covariance and uniform remainder, the medium and large frequencies are negligible, and truncation errors are summable on the retained scales. Fourier inversion therefore yields the claimed lattice probabilities, and the same uniform estimates justify the final dynamical averaging step.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo novelty concerns found

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:2610.28328v1
Authors listed
Jovan Andreevski
Audit date
October 23, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.