Abstract

Since Apéry's proof of the irrationality of ζ(3)ζ(3), decades of work have explored integrals, hypergeometric identities, and recurrences with exceptional arithmetic properties, to discover the strongest quantitative bounds on irrationality measures for zeta values and related constants. Yet, most findings have relied on specially tailored families of such constructions, making their systematic extension difficult. Here we show how these constructions can be connected and generalized into a common multidimensional structure based on conservative matrix fields (CMFs), enabling a systematic discovery of new irrationality proofs and quantitative bounds for irrationality exponents. CMFs are finite-dimensional cocycles of compatible rational matrix shifts, and are shown to capture all the classical constructions developed since Apéry as one-dimensional trajectories. The initial point encodes the mathematical constants; varying the trajectory within a suitable convergence region produces different approximation schemes for the same constants. We use this structure to improve the irrationality measures of famous constants, yielding for example μ(ζ(2))<4.62675μ(ζ(2))<4.62675 and μ(ζ(3))<5.4197μ(ζ(3))<5.4197, and proving that 1,ζ(3),ζ(4)1,ζ(3),ζ(4) are linearly independent over Q\mathbb{Q}, yielding μ(Aζ(3)+Bζ(4))<66.3μ(Aζ(3)+Bζ(4))<66.3 for every (A,B)∈Q2∖{(0,0)}(A,B)\in\mathbb{Q}^2\setminus\{(0,0)\}. The same approach demonstrated over other CMFs provides irrationality proving trajectories for infinitely more mathematical constants. We further construct higher-rank CMFs with explicit initial states for 1,ζ(2),ζ(3),…,ζ(d+1)1,ζ(2),ζ(3),\ldots,ζ(d+1), and identify the arithmetic conditions needed to obtain further, higher-order independence results.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v1

Not a correctness certificate. A green “no issues found” result may include yellow suspected typos or minor formal issues that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated October 23, 2026
01Statements3 reported findingsNo statement issues found

The linear-independence and irrationality-measure conclusions in Section 6 are supported by the written reductions together with the paper's versioned exact-certificate package. The printed proof contains several local precision and inequality-symbol defects, but the certified stronger bounds give verified repairs without changing any theorem statement.

Theorem 6.4No issue found

The joint ζ(3),ζ(4)\zeta(3),\zeta(4) construction crosses the irrationality threshold

PDF pp. 22–28 · arXiv:2610.27799v1

The dual pairing identifies the two limits, the recessive solution gives decay rate g>112.8075g>112.8075, and the forward/dual prime counts give a common-divisor rate at least 30.346730.3467. The independently executed exact notebooks verify the matrix identities, recurrence certificates, finite prime counts, tail bounds, and final interval arithmetic. With growth h<111.105h<111.105, the standard bounded-gap criterion gives linear independence of 1,ζ(3),ζ(4)1,\zeta(3),\zeta(4) and the stated bound below 66.366.3 for each fixed nonzero rational pair.

Theorem 6.16No issue found

The individual ζ(2)\zeta(2) and ζ(3)\zeta(3) measure bounds have certified margins

PDF pp. 28–30 and Appendices B.2–B.4 · arXiv:2610.27799v1

For ζ(2)\zeta(2) the certified carry bound gives h<49.0986383585423h<49.0986383585423 against g>62.636575g>62.636575. For ζ(3)\zeta(3) the combined certificate gives h<91.992990h<91.992990 against g>112.8075g>112.8075. These margins imply respectively μ(ζ(2))<4.62675\mu(\zeta(2))<4.62675 and μ(ζ(3))<5.4197\mu(\zeta(3))<5.4197. All nine pinned notebooks and the two material Meijer-GG identity checks were independently executed successfully from release v1.0.0.

Section 7 and Appendix CNo issue found

The harmonic-weighted Gregory family follows from the displayed spectral certificate

PDF pp. 31–38 and Appendix C · arXiv:2610.27799v1

The cyclic matrix identity, characteristic polynomial, root isolation, and divisor estimate give a positive threshold margin for M≥7165M\geq7165. The supplied exact checker reproduces the printed algebra and a rigorous positive margin, so the stated irrationality conclusion follows under the paper's listed recurrence and nonvanishing inputs.

02Proofs4 reported findingsNo proof issues found

The central written reductions and their cited exact certificates are complete after local precision and comparison-symbol corrections. The versioned supplement was integrity-checked and its nine notebooks plus eight additional exact scripts were independently executed successfully.

Section 6.2Suspected typo

Use lower-bound language for the approximation exponent

PDF p. 28 · proof of Theorem 6.4 · arXiv:2610.27799v1

From a decay lower bound gg and a coefficient-growth upper bound hh, the argument proves δ≥g/h−1\delta\geq g/h-1, not the printed equality δ=g/h−1\delta=g/h-1. The next inequality uses only this lower bound and the certified values g>112.8075g>112.8075, h<111.105h<111.105, so replacing == by ≥\geq is the unique harmless correction.

Lemma 6.21 and proof of Theorem 6.16Suspected typo

Retain enough certified digits in the ζ(2)\zeta(2) growth bound

PDF pp. 29–30 · arXiv:2610.27799v1

The rounded input 12.12842712.128427 yields only 49.098639333…49.098639333\ldots, which does not by itself imply the later h<49.098639h<49.098639. Appendix B.3 and the executed certificate give the stronger bound γ>12.1284279747910\gamma>12.1284279747910, hence h<38.168733+25−(12.1284279747910+233/120)=49.0986383585423….h<38.168733+25-(12.1284279747910+233/120)=49.0986383585423\ldots. Replace the prematurely rounded input by this certified value. The theorem's numerical conclusion is unchanged.

Proof of Theorem 6.16 · ζ(3)\zeta(3) caseSuspected typo

Use the certified combined bound before rounding the denominator margin

PDF p. 30 and Appendix B.4 · arXiv:2610.27799v1

The displayed coarse components total 91.992990243…91.992990243\ldots; rounding the resulting difference directly to 20.8145120.81451 is in the wrong direction for the quotient bound. Appendix B.4 and the reproduced certificate give h<65.451536565866+57−30.458547243805<91.992990,h<65.451536565866+57-30.458547243805<91.992990, so g−h>20.81451g-h>20.81451 and the printed final bound follows. Use this stronger certified line in place of the coarse decimal line.

Supplementary release v1.0.0No issue found in the reviewed proof

The material exact computations are reproducible

Cited supplementary package for Section 6 and Appendices B.1–B.4 · arXiv:2610.27799v1

The release manifest matched all 103 source and fixed-data files. In the pinned Python 3.12 environment, all nine notebooks and all eight additional exact scripts passed, including the joint, ζ(2)\zeta(2), pure-ζ(3)\zeta(3), Meijer-GG, and Gregory checks. This verifies the finite symbolic and interval computations actually used above; the analytic reductions were checked separately in the paper.

New Directions in Irrationality, supplementary release v1.0.0 ↗
03Novelty0 reported findingsNo novelty concerns found

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:2610.27799v1
Authors listed
Elyasheev Leibtag, Hila Barkan, Rotem Kalisch, Shachar Weinbaum, Michael Shalyt, Ido Kaminer
Audit date
October 23, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.