Abstract

To a coprime triple a+b=ca+b=c we attach two coordinates, the quality XX and the logarithmic mass YY, whose ratio λλ measures the balance of the triple and lies asymptotically between 22 and 33. In these coordinates the abcabc conjecture and Szpiro's conjecture for Frey curves become asymptotic bounds with thresholds X=1X=1 and Y=3Y=3, and the direct implications between them follow from the range of λλ. We then place the approximation and power gains of Müller, Taktikos and de Weger in the same plane. Relative to a chosen presentation of the triple, one exponent factor ff relates the gains to the coordinates, and Szpiro's conjecture for this family is equivalent to the asymptotic bound f≤3f\le 3 uniformly over all presentations. Under the two separate asymptotic gain bounds for a fixed choice of presentations, we obtain lim sup⁡X≤9/2\limsup X\le 9/2 and lim sup⁡Y≤27/2\limsup Y\le 27/2 as the radical tends to infinity. Stronger conclusions depend on the presentation or on a joint bound for the gains. We close with numerical data and two research objectives.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v2

Not a correctness certificate. A green “no issues found” result may include yellow suspected typos or minor formal issues that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated October 23, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsNo statement issues found

The quality-plane identities, the comparison between abc and Szpiro thresholds, the presentation-dependent gain decomposition, and the consequences of the two separate gain bounds are correct.

Lemma 2.2 and Proposition 3.4No issue found

The limiting balance interval gives the stated abc–Szpiro implications

PDF pages 2–4 · arXiv:2610.03212v2

Writing the balance as 1 plus log(ab) divided by log(c) gives the strict finite-triple bounds and the full limiting interval from 2 to 3. Since Y equals the balance times X, these bounds convert the abc threshold X=1 into Y=3 and the Frey-curve Szpiro threshold back into X=3/2 with the stated finitely-many-exceptions interpretation.

Proposition 4.2, Corollary 4.3, and Proposition 5.1No issue found

Presentations interpolate correctly between radical and full product

PDF pages 5–7 · arXiv:2610.03212v2

For N dividing P dividing abc, cancellation of logarithms gives Ga·Gp=X, f·Gp=Y, and balance·Ga=f. The extreme choices P=N and P=abc attain the endpoint bounds. Multiplying the asymptotic separate gain bounds gives X at most 9/2, and the universal balance bound then gives Y at most 27/2.

02Proofs3 reported findingsNo proof issues found

The elementary logarithmic arguments and the Frey-curve conductor/discriminant comparison support all central conclusions; the numerical and presentation examples agree with the formulas.

Lemma 3.3No issue found in the reviewed proof

Bounded powers of two do not affect the asymptotic Szpiro ratio

PDF pages 3–4 · arXiv:2610.03212v2

The model is minimal at every odd prime, and the changes at 2 contribute uniformly bounded exponents to both discriminant and conductor. Consequently the Szpiro ratio is 2Y times a factor tending to one as the radical grows, which proves the equivalence of the two asymptotic formulations.

Proofs of Propositions 4.2 and 5.1No issue found in the reviewed proof

All gain bounds follow from exact identities rather than heuristic factorization

PDF pages 5–7 · arXiv:2610.03212v2

The divisibility and radical condition imply N≤P≤abc, so each endpoint inequality is immediate. For any positive tolerance, one common smaller tolerance can be chosen for the two separate gain bounds; outside the union of their finite exceptional sets, direct multiplication yields both asserted bounds.

Examples 4.4–4.6 and Section 6No issue found in the reviewed proof

The examples consistently use presentation-dependent gains

PDF pages 5–9 · arXiv:2610.03212v2

The surd, enhanced-radical, and Pythagorean presentations all divide abc and have the same radical. Substitution into the exact identities reproduces the tabulated values and explains why varying a presentation moves one triple along the hyperbola Ga·Gp=X.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo novelty concerns found

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:2610.03212v2
Authors listed
R. Laniewski, K. Müller
Audit date
October 23, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.