arXiv:2609.35252v1
Abstract
For an integer solution of with and , the integers , and form a triple in which one term is the sum of the other two. When this triple is coprime, and the conjecture predicts that its quality is asymptotically at most . Following Müller, Taktikos and de Weger, we factor this quality through the product into the approximation gain and the power gain G_p=log P/lograd(xy|k|), which is at least . We show that the weak form of Hall's conjecture, which asks that for every outside finitely many solutions, is equivalent to the asymptotic bound . More generally, for , an asymptotic bound gives for every outside finitely many solutions, and for the two statements are equivalent. Since the approximation gain never exceeds the quality, an inequality with exponent gives the same bound for primitive solutions. The case extends to all solutions and recovers the classical implication from the conjecture to weak Hall. We also relate small values of to large partial quotients of .
AI-generated audit
Audit summary
Not a correctness certificate. A green “no issues found” result may include yellow suspected typos or minor formal issues that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.
Current report
Detailed mathematical audit
01Statements3 reported findingsNo statement issues found
The approximation-gain formulation is equivalent to weak Hall at level one, the stated level- implications have the claimed sharp range, and the consequences of and the continued-fraction estimates follow under their stated hypotheses.
Approximation-gain bounds and Hall exponents are converted correctly
PDF pp. 2–4 · arXiv:2609.35252v1
If , then and , forcing the gain above asymptotically. Conversely, gain above first forces and hence ; the resulting bound contradicts the prescribed Hall exponent after a fixed loss. The threshold is genuinely sharp by the displayed family .
The implication works for primitive and nonprimitive solutions
PDF pp. 4–5 · arXiv:2609.35252v1
For primitive solutions, form a coprime triple and the approximation gain is at most its quality. For a general solution, taking gives a coprime divided triple, and the valuation computation proves . Because , the factor can be discarded, yielding the same asymptotic gain bound for all solutions.
Small residuals are related correctly to the next partial quotient
PDF pp. 5–6 · arXiv:2609.35252v1
The factorization gives . The assumed bound puts a reduced fraction inside Legendre's criterion, while the perfect-square case is excluded directly. The exact complete-quotient formula then places strictly between and , which gives the stated equivalence between Hall-small residuals and unusually large following partial quotients.
02Proofs3 reported findingsNo proof issues found
The elementary size estimates, coprimality and valuation arguments, limiting exponent manipulations, and continued-fraction identities were checked through their proof-critical steps; no substantive gap was found.
Coprimality, gain factorization, and both asymptotic implications are complete
PDF pp. 2–4 · arXiv:2609.35252v1
A common prime in any two of propagates to the third, so primitivity makes the three terms pairwise coprime and gives with . In Proposition 3.2, bounded or bounded leaves only finitely many solutions, legitimizing both limiting arguments. The identities and produce exactly the asserted exponent losses.
The division by the common factor retains sufficient radical control
PDF p. 4 · arXiv:2609.35252v1
For , writing and gives and hence ; for but , the exponent in is at least one. Thus every prime in divides , exactly the divisibility needed to apply the universal bound to the divided triple.
The continued-fraction proof uses the standard sharp error formula correctly
PDF pp. 5–6 · arXiv:2609.35252v1
For a convergent , the denominator in the exact error formula is , lying strictly between and . Combined with the factorization identity, this proves the two-sided bound. Since , the subsequent exponent comparisons and the conditional conclusions under follow.
03Novelty0 reported findingsNo novelty concerns found
No non-novelty findings.