Abstract

Let d≥2d\ge2 and let w=(w1,…,wd)\mathbf w=(w_1,\ldots,w_d) satisfy w1≥⋯≥wd>0w_1\ge\cdots\ge w_d>0 and ∑iwi=1\sum_i w_i=1. Set s∗=d−(1+w1)−1s_*=d-(1+w_1)^{-1}. We prove that there exist constants Cd,w>0C_{d,\mathbf w}>0 and ε0=ε0(d,w)>0\varepsilon_0=\varepsilon_0(d,\mathbf w)>0 such that for all 0<ε<ε00<\varepsilon<\varepsilon_0, dim⁡HDI⁡w(ε)≤s∗+Cd,wε. \dim_H\operatorname{DI}_{\mathbf w}(\varepsilon)\le s_*+C_{d,\mathbf w}\sqrt\varepsilon. Together with the lower bound of Kim--Park, this gives the exact formula dim⁡HSing⁡(w)=s∗. \dim_H\operatorname{Sing}(\mathbf w)=s_*.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v1

Not a correctness certificate. A green “no issues found” result may include yellow suspected typos or minor formal issues that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated October 24, 2026
01Statements3 reported findingsNo statement issues found

The accelerated best-approximation construction proves the stated Od,w(ε)O_{d,\mathbf w}(\sqrt{\varepsilon}) upper bound for weighted Dirichlet-improvable vectors. Together with the cited Kim–Park lower bound, it gives the exact Hausdorff dimension d−(1+w1)−1d-(1+w_1)^{-1} for weighted singular vectors.

Theorem 1.2No issue found

The quantitative dimension upper bound follows from a contracting accelerated cover

PDF pp. 3–14 · arXiv:2609.35009v1

Late best approximations of a point in DI⁡w(ε)\operatorname{DI}_{\mathbf w}(\varepsilon) lie in QξQ_\xi with ξ=cwε\xi=c_{\mathbf w}\varepsilon. A gap in their successive minima supplies a proper rational subspace and an exit whose level grows by at least RR. The transverse lattice comparison and shell counts give a successor sum below one at exponent d+δd+\delta with δ=Mξ\delta=M\sqrt\xi. Covering each approximation rectangle at its shortest side then converts this exponent into s∗+δ/(1+w1)s_\ast+\delta/(1+w_1), exactly the claimed error order.

Theorem 1.1No issue found

The exact weighted singular dimension is obtained

PDF pp. 2–3 and 14–16 · arXiv:2609.35009v1

Since Sing⁡(w)⊆DI⁡w(ε)\operatorname{Sing}(\mathbf w)\subseteq\operatorname{DI}_{\mathbf w}(\varepsilon) for every ε\varepsilon, Theorem 1.2 gives the upper bound s∗s_\ast after letting ε↓0\varepsilon\downarrow0. The lower bound s∗s_\ast is precisely the theorem stated in the cited Kim–Park paper (arXiv:2207.07944v2). The independent minimal-vector argument in Appendix A also proves the required upper bound directly.

Appendix ANo issue found

The direct singular-dimension proof gives the same sharp upper bound

PDF pp. 14–17 · arXiv:2609.35009v1

Minimality supplies a uniform separation in the rescaled Farey lattice. The one-step lattice count has only a logarithmic loss in 1/ε1/\varepsilon, and iterating the resulting cover gives the error log⁡Hε/((1+w1)log⁡(1/ε))\log H_\varepsilon/((1+w_1)\log(1/\varepsilon)). This tends to zero and recovers dim⁡HSing⁡(w)≤s∗\dim_H\operatorname{Sing}(\mathbf w)\leq s_\ast.

02Proofs4 reported findingsNo proof issues found

The best-approximation estimates, successive-minimum gap construction, quotient-lattice comparison, shell counting, and Hausdorff-cover recursion were checked through their proof-critical inequalities; no substantive gap was found.

Lemmas 2.1–2.6No issue found in the reviewed proof

The acceleration is available in every dimension

PDF pp. 4–7 · arXiv:2609.35009v1

The Farey lattice has covolume ∣u∣−1|u|^{-1} and its shortest vector controls the weighted best-approximation cell with the stated constant. Minkowski's second theorem forces a multiplicative gap among the successive minima when ξ\xi is small. The span below that gap lifts to a proper rational subspace HuH_u, and Lemma 2.6 shows that the first later best approximation outside HuH_u has level greater than RLu∣u∣RL_u|u|. Rational independence guarantees that an exit eventually occurs.

Lemmas 3.1–3.3 and Proposition 3.4No issue found in the reviewed proof

Transverse minima and exit counts have the required powers

PDF pp. 7–12 · arXiv:2609.35009v1

Modulo VuV_u, the rescaled lattices D∣u∣/∣v∣ΓvD_{|u|/|v|}\Gamma_v and Γu\Gamma_u coincide. Reducing coefficients against a lattice basis of VuV_u costs at most muLu/2m_uL_u/2, while the gap λmu+1>RLu\lambda_{m_u+1}>RL_u absorbs that cost and yields the factors (∣v∣/∣u∣)wd(|v|/|u|)^{w_d}. Counting projected lattice points in the intermediate and exit shells then gives exactly the three cases in Proposition 3.4; the injectivity assertions hold because each level interval has the length of the relevant primitive denominator.

Proposition 4.1 and Lemma 4.2No issue found in the reviewed proof

The successor sum contracts at the dimension exponent

PDF pp. 12–14 · arXiv:2609.35009v1

After multiplying the witness count by the exit count and the weight (∣u∣/∣w∣)d+δ(|u|/|w|)^{d+\delta}, all kk-series converge uniformly and the two possible ℓ\ell-series cost at most O(δ−1)O(\delta^{-1}). The transverse-minimum product contributes OR(ξ)O_R(\sqrt\xi) and the final minimum contributes O(R−1)O(R^{-1}). Choosing RR first and then δ=Mξ\delta=M\sqrt\xi makes the sum strictly contractive. The cube count for β(u)\beta(u) has total ss-cost ∣u∣−d−(1+w1)(s−s∗)|u|^{-d-(1+w_1)(s-s_\ast)}, matching the successor exponent without a missing factor.

Lemma A.1No issue found in the reviewed proof

The minimal-vector separation and recursive cover are coherent

PDF pp. 14–16 · arXiv:2609.35009v1

A lattice vector of sup norm below 1/21/2 would, after reducing its level modulo qq and primitively rescaling, contradict minimality. Full-dimensional lattice spans contribute O(εkd/N)O(\varepsilon k^d/N) points and proper spans contribute O(kd−1)O(k^{d-1}); weighting by the level gives the harmonic loss 1+log⁡(1/ε)1+\log(1/\varepsilon). The subsequent recursion and cube side εw1Tn−1−w1\varepsilon^{w_1}T_n^{-1-w_1} yield the displayed dimension exponent.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo novelty concerns found

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:2609.35009v1
Authors listed
Bohan Yang, Tianru Zhu
Audit date
October 24, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.