arXiv:2605.17529v2

Bohr obstructions to recurrence along Hardy-field sequences

Kangbo Ouyang, Saúl Rodríguez-Martín, Leiye Xu, Shuhao Zhang

math.NTmath.COmath.DS37A4437B2011B30

Abstract

We construct Bohr obstructions to multiple recurrence along rounded Hardy-field sequences, showing that the real derivative-span criterion of Bergelson, Moreira, and Richter is essentially sharp and answering two of their questions. For ENE\subseteq\mathbb N and u:NZu:\mathbb N\to\mathbb Z, set Ru(E):={nN:E(Eu(n))}R_{u}(E):=\{n\in\mathbb N:E\cap(E-u(n))\neq\varnothing\}. We prove that, if f1,,fkf_1,\dots,f_k are functions of polynomial growth from a Hardy field and some real linear combination of f1,,fkf_1,\dots,f_k and their derivatives has a nonzero finite limit, then there exist MNM\in\mathbb N and a basic Bohr set ENE\subseteq\mathbb N such that i=1kR[Mfi](E)\bigcap_{i=1}^k R_{[Mf_i]}(E) is not thick. In particular, for some Bohr set EE, the set R[t3/2](E)R[2t3/2+t](E)R_{[t^{3/2}]}(E)\cap R_{[\sqrt{2}t^{3/2}+t]}(E) is piecewise syndetic but not thick. We also prove that, if for some λ1,,λkRλ_1,\dots,λ_k\in\mathbb{R} we have infx1iλifi(x)T>12iλi,\inf_{x\geq 1}\left\|\sum_{i}λ_if_i(x)\right\|_{\mathbb{T}}>\frac{1}{2} \sum_i|λ_i|, then iR[fi](E)=\bigcap_i R_{[f_i]}(E)=\varnothing for some basic Bohr set EE. More generally, our results apply with [][\cdot] replaced by any rounding function ρ:RZρ:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{Z} satisfying supxRρ(x)x<\sup_{x\in\mathbb{R}}|ρ(x)-x|<\infty.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v2

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 18, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsCorrect

The derivative-span and full-span Bohr obstructions, the empty-return criterion, and the counterexamples answering the two Hardy-field recurrence questions are correct.

Theorems A–C and Examples 1.10–1.12Correct

Finite limiting linear combinations create the claimed Bohr obstructions

Pages 4–6 and Sections 3–4 · arXiv:2605.17529v2

Taylor expansion converts a derivative combination with nonzero finite limit into a uniformly separated linear combination of finitely many translates. Choosing a small basic Bohr neighborhood forces every simultaneous return vector near zero, contradicting that separation after the integer homothety absorbs rounding errors. Under the stronger torus-distance hypothesis the contradiction applies at every time, giving empty intersection. The t3/2t^{3/2} examples satisfy the asserted integer derivative-span conditions and the chosen irrational offset supplies the obstruction.

Full paper, version 2
Theorems B–C and Examples 1.10–1.12Correct

Full-span obstructions and empty-return examples delimit the positive recurrence criteria

Pages 7–12 and Sections 3–4 · arXiv:2605.17529v2

The homothety factor in Theorem B is retained where denominators require it, and the examples show why it cannot generally be removed. The rounding construction in Theorem C produces an explicit Bohr neighborhood whose simultaneous return set is empty without asserting failure outside the displayed Hardy-field hypotheses.

02Proofs2 reported findingsCorrect

The Bohr-set, finite-difference, rounding-error, Hardy-field, and example calculations are correct and complete.

Sections 2–4Correct and complete

The homothety dominates every rounding error uniformly

Pages 6–15 · Sections 2–4 · arXiv:2605.17529v2

Basic Bohr sets have positive density and are syndetic by unique ergodicity on the orbit closure. The finite-difference coefficients reproduce the required derivatives with an error vanishing uniformly over each fixed block. The selected integer MM exceeds the total bounded rounding error divided by the limiting separation, so the modular contradiction is strict. Polynomial-shadow and joint-intersectivity computations in the examples are explicit.

Sections 2–4Correct and complete

Finite-difference reduction, Bohr separation, and rounding control close the obstruction proofs

Pages 13–33 · arXiv:2605.17529v2

Repeated differences isolate the first derivative combination that is not polynomially negligible. Rational approximation produces a torus character separating its values, and error bounds survive the fixed homothety and rounding map. The constructed neighborhood is open and nonempty, while every candidate return violates one of its coordinate constraints.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:2605.17529v2
Authors listed
Kangbo Ouyang, Saúl Rodríguez-Martín, Leiye Xu, Shuhao Zhang
Audit date
August 18, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.