arXiv:2509.25628v3

A note on general isolation result in Diophantine Approximation

Sergei Pitcyn, Nikolay Moshchevitin

math.NT11J0411J0611J13

Abstract

In the present paper we give very simple general statements which deal with approximation of a real number by rationals and are related to isolation phenomenon. In particular we study functions f(x)>f1(x)>0 f(x)>f_1(x)>0 such that existence of solutions pq\frac{p}{q} of Diophantine inequality αpq<f(q)q2 \left| α-\frac{p}{q}\right|< \frac{f(q)}{q^2} leads to the existence of solutions of inequality αpq<f1(q)q2 \left| α-\frac{p}{q}\right|< \frac{f_1(q)}{q^2} .

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v3

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 20, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsCorrect

The isolation principle for improvements of infinitely-often Diophantine inequalities is correct, including the matrix generalization. The proof needs a local compactness repair described under Proofs.

Theorems 1 and 3Correct

A universal positive improvement can be chosen independently of the matrix

Pages 2–3 and 7–8 · Theorems 1 and 3 · arXiv:2509.25628v3

Matrices already satisfying the half-sized inequality are handled by the fixed improvement f/2f/2. On the complementary tail sets, the family-F\mathcal F exclusion of equality gives a positive finite-level gap; taking the smaller of the two improvements proves the implication for every matrix.

Full paper, version 3
Theorem 2Correct

The rational-valued scalar case has the announced effective improvement

Pages 3 and 8–10 · Theorem 2 and Section 6 · arXiv:2509.25628v3

The recursive continued-fraction construction tests finitely many rational candidates at each denominator and chooses a positive rational gap below all active errors. The irrationality of α\alpha prevents equality with a rational threshold, so the resulting computable function is positive and gives the implication stated in Theorem 2.

02Proofs2 reported findingsContains incorrect or incomplete proofs

The category argument and continued-fraction specialization are correct. In Theorem 3, however, the displayed minimum is taken over the wrong complement and can be zero or negative; replacing it by the compact tail complement with the active inequality restores the proof.

Equation (19)Incorrect as written; verified repair

The claimed positive minimum on a single-vector complement is false

Pages 7–8 · equation (19) and proof of Theorem 3 · arXiv:2509.25628v3

The set MqcM_{\mathbf q}^{c} only excludes the half-sized inequality for one vector. It still contains matrices with qm/nΘq=f(q)|\mathbf q|^{m/n}\lVert\Theta\mathbf q\rVert=f(|\mathbf q|), where the displayed gap is zero, and matrices with larger values, where it is negative. For x=qx=|\mathbf q|, instead minimize over the compact tail complement Mxc=rxMrc\mathcal M_x^c=\bigcap_{|\mathbf r|\geq x}M_{\mathbf r}^c restricted to pairs satisfying qm/nΘqf(x)|\mathbf q|^{m/n}\lVert\Theta\mathbf q\rVert\leq f(x). The definition of F\mathcal F excludes equality uniformly for large xx, so compactness gives a positive gap; every ΘMc\Theta\in\mathcal M^c belongs to these tail complements for all sufficiently large xx. This supplies exactly the missing universal g2(x)g_2(x).

Sections 4 and 6Correct and complete

The Baire-category and one-dimensional specialization arguments are sound

Pages 4–7 and 8–10 · Lemmas 1–2 and proof of Theorem 2 · arXiv:2509.25628v3

The exceptional parameter set is a countable union of nowhere-dense images, and the rational-value hypothesis rules out the forbidden equality by linear independence. The continued-fraction estimates then give the effective scalar refinement stated in the introduction.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:2509.25628v3
Authors listed
Sergei Pitcyn, Nikolay Moshchevitin
Audit date
August 20, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.