arXiv:2509.25628v3
Abstract
In the present paper we give very simple general statements which deal with approximation of a real number by rationals and are related to isolation phenomenon. In particular we study functions such that existence of solutions of Diophantine inequality leads to the existence of solutions of inequality .
AI-generated audit
Audit summary
Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.
Current report
Detailed mathematical audit
01Statements2 reported findingsCorrect
The isolation principle for improvements of infinitely-often Diophantine inequalities is correct, including the matrix generalization. The proof needs a local compactness repair described under Proofs.
A universal positive improvement can be chosen independently of the matrix
Pages 2–3 and 7–8 · Theorems 1 and 3 · arXiv:2509.25628v3
Matrices already satisfying the half-sized inequality are handled by the fixed improvement . On the complementary tail sets, the family- exclusion of equality gives a positive finite-level gap; taking the smaller of the two improvements proves the implication for every matrix.
Full paper, version 3 ↗The rational-valued scalar case has the announced effective improvement
Pages 3 and 8–10 · Theorem 2 and Section 6 · arXiv:2509.25628v3
The recursive continued-fraction construction tests finitely many rational candidates at each denominator and chooses a positive rational gap below all active errors. The irrationality of prevents equality with a rational threshold, so the resulting computable function is positive and gives the implication stated in Theorem 2.
02Proofs2 reported findingsContains incorrect or incomplete proofs
The category argument and continued-fraction specialization are correct. In Theorem 3, however, the displayed minimum is taken over the wrong complement and can be zero or negative; replacing it by the compact tail complement with the active inequality restores the proof.
The claimed positive minimum on a single-vector complement is false
Pages 7–8 · equation (19) and proof of Theorem 3 · arXiv:2509.25628v3
The set only excludes the half-sized inequality for one vector. It still contains matrices with , where the displayed gap is zero, and matrices with larger values, where it is negative. For , instead minimize over the compact tail complement restricted to pairs satisfying . The definition of excludes equality uniformly for large , so compactness gives a positive gap; every belongs to these tail complements for all sufficiently large . This supplies exactly the missing universal .
The Baire-category and one-dimensional specialization arguments are sound
Pages 4–7 and 8–10 · Lemmas 1–2 and proof of Theorem 2 · arXiv:2509.25628v3
The exceptional parameter set is a countable union of nowhere-dense images, and the rational-value hypothesis rules out the forbidden equality by linear independence. The continued-fraction estimates then give the effective scalar refinement stated in the introduction.
03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings
No non-novelty findings.