Abstract

For ergodic optimization on any topological dynamical system, with real-valued potential function ff belonging to any separable Banach space BB of continuous functions, we show that the ff-maximizing measure is typically unique, in the strong sense that a countable collection of hypersurfaces contains the exceptional set of those f∈Bf\in B with non-unique maximizing measure. This strengthens previous results asserting that the uniqueness set is both residual and prevalent.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v2

Not a correctness certificate. A green “no issues found” result may include yellow suspected typos or minor formal issues that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated October 23, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsNo statement issues found

The residual, prevalent, countable-hypersurface, and Lipschitz-sparse uniqueness results are correct for the respective topological vector spaces of potentials.

Theorems 1, 2, and 4No issue found

Unique maximizing measures are topologically and probabilistically typical

PDF pages 3–7 · arXiv:2506.01518v2

Upper semicontinuity of the maximizing-measure multifunction identifies its continuity points with unique maximizers. In a separable Banach space, uniqueness is equivalent to Gateaux differentiability of the convex maximum-average functional, so Zajíček's theorem gives the countable delta-convex hypersurface cover. Christensen's theorem gives the corresponding prevalence result for separable Frechet spaces.

Proposition 3 and Theorem 5No issue found

The exceptional set is still sparse in the countable-extreme-point and Lipschitz settings

PDF pages 6–9 · arXiv:2506.01518v2

With countably many extreme invariant measures, nonuniqueness forces equality of two distinct continuous linear functionals and hence lies in a countable union of hyperplanes. In Lip(X), a countable family of separated Wasserstein ball pairs covers every nonunique case, and each equality locus is a Lipschitz graph over a hyperplane.

02Proofs3 reported findingsNo proof issues found

The proofs correctly connect multifunction continuity, differentiability of the support functional, and Wasserstein separation. The needed continuity and density arguments are supplied.

Proof of Theorem 1No issue found in the reviewed proof

Continuity of the argmax map is equivalent to uniqueness

PDF pages 3–4 · arXiv:2506.01518v2

Closedness of the graph follows by passing the maximizing inequality through convergence in V and weak-star convergence of measures. At a singleton value, upper semicontinuity gives lower semicontinuity. With two maximizers, density of V in C(X) supplies a separating perturbation that destroys lower semicontinuity.

Proof of Theorem 2No issue found in the reviewed proof

Directional derivatives detect exactly the maximizing measures

PDF pages 4–5 · arXiv:2506.01518v2

The two-sided difference-quotient bounds squeeze every directional derivative to integration against the unique maximizing measure. Conversely, two maximizing measures can be separated by a function in V, giving unequal one-sided derivatives. The resulting derivative is a continuous linear functional, so the invoked differentiability theorem applies exactly to the exceptional set.

Appendix, proof of Theorem 5No issue found in the reviewed proof

Wasserstein-separated balls produce Lipschitz hypersurfaces

PDF pages 7–9 · arXiv:2506.01518v2

Every pair of distinct maximizing measures can be captured by disjoint closed balls from a countable dense family. A 1-Lipschitz separator creates a uniform positive slope gap between the two restricted support functions. Hence their difference has one zero on each affine line, and the zero varies Lipschitz-continuously over the complementary hyperplane.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo novelty concerns found

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:2506.01518v2
Authors listed
Oliver Jenkinson, Xiaoran Li, Yuexin Liao, Yiwei Zhang
Audit date
October 23, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.