Abstract

We study constrained quantization of a compactly supported probability PP on RD\mathbb{R}^D by codebooks in a nonempty closed set SS. For 0<r≤∞0<r\le\infty, the constrained error en,re_{n,r} is attained and satisfies en,r↓Lr=∥dist⁡(⋅,S)∥Lr(P)e_{n,r}\downarrow L_r=\|\operatorname{dist}(\cdot,S)\|_{L^r(P)}. Set Δn,r=en,rr−LrrΔ_{n,r}=e_{n,r}^r-L_r^r for finite rr. A Borel nearest-point selector TT induces μ=T∗Pμ=T_*P. Writing qn,sq_{n,s} for the classical LsL^s quantization error, we obtain en,r−Lr≤2qn,r(μ)e_{n,r}-L_r\le2q_{n,r}(μ) and Δn,r≤Crqn,1(μ)Δ_{n,r}\le C_rq_{n,1}(μ) for 1≤r<∞1\le r<\infty, with CrC_r independent of nn, and Δn,r≤2rqn,r(μ)rΔ_{n,r}\le2^rq_{n,r}(μ)^r for 0<r<10<r<1. Also, en,∞−L∞≤2cn(E)e_{n,\infty}-L_\infty\le2c_n(E), where EE is the nearest-point image of supp⁡P\operatorname{supp}P and cn(E)c_n(E) is its covering radius. For 1≤r<∞1\le r<\infty, a weighted power-growth condition with exponent β>0β>0 on a fixed source set FF bounds Δn,rΔ_{n,r} below by the classical ββ-power quantization cost of νF=T∗(wP∣F)ν_F=T_*(wP|_F). If dνF=w^ dηdν_F=\widehat w\,dη for a compactly supported reference probability ηη and w^∈Ap(η)\widehat w\in A_p(η), 1<p<∞1<p<\infty, then Δn,r≥νF(RD)[w^]Ap(η)−1qn,β/p(η)βΔ_{n,r}\geν_F(\mathbb{R}^D)[\widehat w]_{A_p(η)}^{-1}q_{n,β/p}(η)^β. These comparisons yield bounds for the quantization dimensions defined by en,r−Lre_{n,r}-L_r and Δn,r1/rΔ_{n,r}^{1/r}, with distinct behavior at positive and zero baselines. Convex and uniformly prox-regular constraints supply the growth weights through their projection inequalities. Circle and lifted Cantor distributions give matching quadratic-excess rates, while rectifiable weighted projections give lower Zador estimates.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v2

Not a correctness certificate. A green “no issues found” result may include yellow suspected typos or minor formal issues that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated October 23, 2026
01Statements4 reported findingsNo statement issues found

The existence and baseline-limit results, the projection-based upper bounds, the weighted lower bounds, and the resulting quantization-dimension estimates are supported under their stated hypotheses. The geometric examples correctly instantiate those general results.

Lemmas 3, 4, 7, and 8No issue found

Nearest-point selection, attainment, and convergence to the baseline are valid

PDF pp. 5–10 · Section 2 · arXiv:2505.10801v2

Compactness of the source and closedness of the constraint make every nearest-point set nonempty and compact, and the projection graph is compact. The measurable selector is obtained from the stated open-set inverse images. Localization confines all relevant centers to a compact set, so minimizing codebooks exist, while finite nets of the nearest-point image force en,re_{n,r} down to the exact baseline LrL_r (and give the analogous infinite-order limit).

Theorem 1No issue found

Projection upper estimates and their dimension consequences are supported

PDF pp. 3–4 and 12–15 · Theorem 1 and Section 3 · arXiv:2505.10801v2

For a codebook on the selected projection image, the triangle inequality bounds the source distance by the baseline distance plus the projection-space distance. Minkowski's inequality gives the finite-order error bound when rr is at least one, the elementary subadditivity inequality gives the 0<r<10<r<1 power-excess bound, and a covering argument gives the infinite-order estimate. The logarithmic transfer lemmas then give the stated box-dimension bounds with the correct scaling factors.

Theorem 2 and Corollary 20No issue found

Weighted growth yields the claimed lower estimates

PDF pp. 4–5 and 17–23 · Theorem 2, Theorem 19, and Corollary 20 · arXiv:2505.10801v2

The pointwise growth hypothesis integrates to the quantization cost of the weighted pushforward measure. The ApA_p condition and Hölder's inequality compare this cost with the appropriate ordinary quantization error raised to the growth exponent, using exactly the displayed weight constant. The upper ball estimate supplies the stated power-law lower rate by layer-cake integration, and the scalar comparison between power excess and ordinary excess transfers it to the remaining errors and dimensions.

Propositions 25–26 and Examples 27–29No issue found

The principal geometric examples attain the advertised rates

PDF pp. 26–32 · Section 5 · arXiv:2505.10801v2

The convex nearest-point inequality supplies quadratic growth for separated convex constraints. For circular constraints, the explicit chordal geometry and regular one-dimensional projected measure give matching quadratic-excess rates, and the lifted Cantor example correctly replaces the Euclidean dimension by the Cantor dimension. The separate example for 0<r<10<r<1 is consistent with the different power scaling in Theorem 1.

02Proofs3 reported findingsNo proof issues found

The central compactness, projection-comparison, weighted Hölder, ball-growth, and geometric arguments are correct and complete. The uses of the cited quantization facts are either standard in the stated form or independently reproduced by the paper's estimates.

Lemmas 3–8No issue found in the reviewed proof

The measurable-selection and compactness steps close the existence argument

PDF pp. 5–10 · Section 2 · arXiv:2505.10801v2

Upper semicontinuity of the projection correspondence gives the required Borel inverse images, so the finite-valued approximation constructs a Borel nearest-point selector. Replacing centers outside the fixed compact localization set decreases every source distance, and compactness of its codebook powers permits passage to a minimizing limit. The baseline convergence proof then uses a finite net of the compact projection image without changing any quantifier or constant.

Theorem 1No issue found in the reviewed proof

All projection comparisons have the required direction and parameter range

PDF pp. 12–15 · proofs of Theorem 1 and Lemmas 14–15 · arXiv:2505.10801v2

The selected projected center is admissible in the original constraint, so the comparison starts in the correct direction. The mean-value estimate is used only in the range where its derivative is uniformly bounded, while the subadditivity argument treats the smaller-order range separately. The support-density argument in Lemma 15 correctly equates full-mass covering numbers with those of the support and justifies the dimension transfer.

Theorem 19 and Theorem 2No issue found in the reviewed proof

The weighted lower-bound chain is complete

PDF pp. 17–20 · Section 4 · arXiv:2505.10801v2

Integration of the pointwise growth inequality first gives the weighted projected cost for every localized codebook. Hölder's inequality with the reciprocal weight then yields the exact ApA_p factor, and the ball-mass union bound followed by layer-cake integration gives the explicit power-law constant. The final conversion from power excess to the two other excess conventions uses a uniform bound on the attained errors and preserves the claimed exponents.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo novelty concerns found

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:2505.10801v2
Authors listed
Chenxing Qian
Audit date
October 23, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.