arXiv:2409.15607v4

Singularity, weighted uniform approximation, intersections and rates

Dmitry Kleinbock, Nikolay Moshchevitin, Jacqueline Warren, Barak Weiss

math.NTmath.DS11J1311J5437A44

Abstract

A classical argument was introduced by Khintchine in 1926 in order to exhibit the existence of totally irrational singular linear forms in two variables. This argument was subsequently revisited and extended by many authors. For instance, in 1959 Jarnik used it to show that for n2n \geq 2 and for any non-increasing positive ff there are totally irrational matrices AMm,n(R)A \in M_{m,n}({\mathbb R}) such that for all large enough tt there are pZm,qZn{0}\mathbf{p} \in {\mathbb Z}^m, \mathbf{q} \in {\mathbb Z}^n \smallsetminus \{0\} with qt  and  Aqpf(t).\|\mathbf{q}\| \leq t \ \text{ and } \ \|A \mathbf{q} - \mathbf{p}\| \leq f(t). We denote the collection of such matrices by UAm,n(f)\mathrm{UA}^*_{m,n}(f). We adapt Khintchine's argument to show that the sets UAm,n(f)\mathrm{UA}^*_{m,n}(f), and their weighted analogues UAm,n(f,w)\mathrm{UA}^*_{m,n}(f, \mathbf{w}), intersect many manifolds and fractals, and have strong intersection properties. For example, we show that: When n2n \geq 2, the set wUA(f,w)\bigcap_{\mathbf{w}} \mathrm{UA}^*(f, \mathbf{w}) , where the intersection is over all weights w\mathbf{w}, is nonempty, and moreover intesects many manifolds and fractals; For n2n \geq 2, there are vectors in Rn{\mathbb R}^n which are simultaneously kk-singular for every kk, in the sense of Yu; when n3n \geq 3, UA1,n(f)+UA1,n(f)=Rn\mathrm{UA}^*_{1,n}(f) + \mathrm{UA}^*_{1,n}(f) = {\mathbb R}^n. We also obtain new bounds on the rate of singularity which can be attained by column vectors in analytic submanifolds of dimension at least 2 in Rn{\mathbb R}^n.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v4

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 19, 2026
01Statements3 reported findingsCorrect

The abstract intersection theorem and its weighted, higher-order, algebraic, sumset, and rate applications are correct; the monotonicity word in the column-vector rate theorems is reversed in print but uniquely repaired by the proof.

Theorem 1.5Correct

The abstract simultaneous-uniformity theorem is correct

Pages 5 and 9–11 · Theorem 1.5 · arXiv:2409.15607v4

Total density produces a new aligned resonant set inside every current neighborhood, respect prevents it from being trapped in the next forbidden set, and continuity enforces the requested approximation. Iterating over all systems and forbidden sets gives density, while the no-isolated-points condition supplies branching and uncountability.

Full paper, version 4
Theorems 1.7–1.12Correct

The weighted, manifold, algebraic, and sumset applications are correct

Pages 6–8 and 11–23 · application theorems · arXiv:2409.15607v4

Rational affine subspaces form the aligned totally dense families for matrices and weights; analytic intersections satisfy the respect property; Veronese maps encode all polynomial degrees; and the translated affine families used in the sumset argument avoid every rational hyperplane.

Theorems 1.13 and 7.2Typo · no status impact

The monotonicity hypothesis should say non-increasing

Pages 8 and 22–23 · Theorems 1.13 and 7.2 · arXiv:2409.15607v4

Both statements call the approximating function non-decreasing. The proof immediately uses that the function is non-increasing to show that the transferred error function is non-increasing, and the claimed exponent consequence requires decreasing power functions. Replacing non-decreasing by non-increasing in the two statements uniquely restores the proved theorem.

02Proofs2 reported findingsCorrect

The nested topological construction, geometric verification of its hypotheses, and transference argument are correct and complete after the monotonicity typo is repaired.

Proof of Theorem 1.5Correct and complete

The diagonal nested-set construction handles every countable requirement

Pages 9–11 · proof of Theorem 1.5 · arXiv:2409.15607v4

The construction cycles through every Diophantine system and forbidden set, selects an aligned resonant set by total density, and shrinks to an open neighborhood where the desired inequality holds. Local compactness guarantees a nonempty nested intersection, and branching establishes uncountability.

Sections 3–7Correct and complete after the stated repair

The Diophantine applications and rate transference close

Pages 11–23 · application and transference proofs · arXiv:2409.15607v4

The affine incidence lemmas verify total density for the weighted and translated systems, analytic continuation verifies respect, and the convex-body transference lemma converts higher-order row approximation into column approximation with the exact rate. Under the corrected non-increasing hypothesis, the inverse scale map is monotone and the auxiliary error function meets Theorem 4.2.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:2409.15607v4
Authors listed
Dmitry Kleinbock, Nikolay Moshchevitin, Jacqueline Warren, Barak Weiss
Audit date
August 19, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.