arXiv:2409.15607v4
Abstract
A classical argument was introduced by Khintchine in 1926 in order to exhibit the existence of totally irrational singular linear forms in two variables. This argument was subsequently revisited and extended by many authors. For instance, in 1959 Jarnik used it to show that for and for any non-increasing positive there are totally irrational matrices such that for all large enough there are with We denote the collection of such matrices by . We adapt Khintchine's argument to show that the sets , and their weighted analogues , intersect many manifolds and fractals, and have strong intersection properties. For example, we show that: When , the set , where the intersection is over all weights , is nonempty, and moreover intesects many manifolds and fractals; For , there are vectors in which are simultaneously -singular for every , in the sense of Yu; when , . We also obtain new bounds on the rate of singularity which can be attained by column vectors in analytic submanifolds of dimension at least 2 in .
AI-generated audit
Audit summary
Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.
Current report
Detailed mathematical audit
01Statements3 reported findingsCorrect
The abstract intersection theorem and its weighted, higher-order, algebraic, sumset, and rate applications are correct; the monotonicity word in the column-vector rate theorems is reversed in print but uniquely repaired by the proof.
The abstract simultaneous-uniformity theorem is correct
Pages 5 and 9–11 · Theorem 1.5 · arXiv:2409.15607v4
Total density produces a new aligned resonant set inside every current neighborhood, respect prevents it from being trapped in the next forbidden set, and continuity enforces the requested approximation. Iterating over all systems and forbidden sets gives density, while the no-isolated-points condition supplies branching and uncountability.
Full paper, version 4 ↗The weighted, manifold, algebraic, and sumset applications are correct
Pages 6–8 and 11–23 · application theorems · arXiv:2409.15607v4
Rational affine subspaces form the aligned totally dense families for matrices and weights; analytic intersections satisfy the respect property; Veronese maps encode all polynomial degrees; and the translated affine families used in the sumset argument avoid every rational hyperplane.
The monotonicity hypothesis should say non-increasing
Pages 8 and 22–23 · Theorems 1.13 and 7.2 · arXiv:2409.15607v4
Both statements call the approximating function non-decreasing. The proof immediately uses that the function is non-increasing to show that the transferred error function is non-increasing, and the claimed exponent consequence requires decreasing power functions. Replacing non-decreasing by non-increasing in the two statements uniquely restores the proved theorem.
02Proofs2 reported findingsCorrect
The nested topological construction, geometric verification of its hypotheses, and transference argument are correct and complete after the monotonicity typo is repaired.
The diagonal nested-set construction handles every countable requirement
Pages 9–11 · proof of Theorem 1.5 · arXiv:2409.15607v4
The construction cycles through every Diophantine system and forbidden set, selects an aligned resonant set by total density, and shrinks to an open neighborhood where the desired inequality holds. Local compactness guarantees a nonempty nested intersection, and branching establishes uncountability.
The Diophantine applications and rate transference close
Pages 11–23 · application and transference proofs · arXiv:2409.15607v4
The affine incidence lemmas verify total density for the weighted and translated systems, analytic continuation verifies respect, and the convex-body transference lemma converts higher-order row approximation into column approximation with the exact rate. Under the corrected non-increasing hypothesis, the inverse scale map is monotone and the auxiliary error function meets Theorem 4.2.
03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings
No non-novelty findings.