Abstract

A pair (A,b)(A,\mathbf{b}) of a real m×nm\times n matrix AA and bRm\mathbf{b}\in\mathbb{R}^m is said to be infinitely badly approximable\textit{infinitely badly approximable} if lim infqZn,qqnmAqbZ=, \liminf_{\mathbf{q}\in\mathbb{Z}^n, \|\mathbf{q}\|\to\infty} \|\mathbf{q}\|^{\frac{n}{m}}\|A\mathbf{q}-\mathbf{b}\|_{\mathbb{Z}} =\infty, where Z\|\cdot\|_\mathbb{Z} denotes the distance from the nearest integer vector. In this article, we introduce a novel concept of singularity for (A,b)(A,\mathbf{b}) and characterize the infinitely badly approximable property by this singular property. As an application, we compute the Hausdorff dimension of the infinitely badly approximable set. We also discuss dynamical interpretations on the space of grids in Rm+n\mathbb{R}^{m+n}.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v2

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 19, 2026
01Statements3 reported findingsCorrect

The transference characterization of infinitely badly approximable affine forms, the one-dimensional classification, the dimension estimates, and the divergent-orbit consequence are correct as stated.

Theorem 1.1Correct

The transference characterization is correct

Pages 2 and 7–8 · Theorem 1.1 and its proof · arXiv:2406.00821v2

The paper rewrites infinite bad approximability through the absence of bounded inhomogeneous solutions at arbitrarily large scales and applies the stated transference alternative in both directions. The norm exponents and the roles of AA and tA{}^tA match throughout, and the resulting condition is exactly singularity of the transpose for the fixed target.

Full paper, version 2
Theorems 1.4 and 1.5Correct

The Hausdorff-dimension bounds follow from the announced constructions

Pages 3–4 and 8–19 · Theorems 1.4–1.5 · arXiv:2406.00821v2

For m=1m=1, the lower and upper coverings use compatible best-approximation scales and yield the displayed dimension of the singular-target fibers. The uniform-exponent estimate in Theorem 1.5 is then obtained by inserting the transference exponent into the same covering bound; the exceptional endpoint cases are handled separately in the proof.

Theorem 1.7Correct

The dynamical dimension statement is correct

Pages 5 and 20–21 · Theorem 1.7 · arXiv:2406.00821v2

The affine-grid correspondence identifies the required divergent trajectories with the infinitely badly approximable target set, and the product/local-coordinate argument transfers the previously established fiber dimension without changing the codimension.

02Proofs2 reported findingsCorrect

The transference, self-similar covering, exponent, and homogeneous-dynamics arguments are correct and complete.

Proof of Theorem 1.1Correct and complete

Both implications use the transference inequalities with the correct quantifiers

Pages 7–8 · proof of Theorem 1.1 · arXiv:2406.00821v2

The proof fixes the target before passing to arbitrarily large approximation scales, and the contrapositive direction retains the same threshold. No pointwise-to-uniform interchange is made.

Sections 3–5Correct and complete

The dimension and orbit arguments close

Pages 8–21 · Sections 3–5 · arXiv:2406.00821v2

The child-count and separation estimates have the exponents required by the fractal-dimension lemmas, the upper covers are summable in the stated parameter regimes, and the final orbit argument invokes the established affine-grid correspondence with no missing case.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:2406.00821v2
Authors listed
Taehyeong Kim
Audit date
August 19, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.