arXiv:2303.17134v1
Abstract
In this paper, we present a general principle for the Lebesgue measure theory of limsup sets defined by rectangles under the hypothesis of ubiquity for rectangles.
AI-generated audit
Audit summary
Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.
Current report
Detailed mathematical audit
01Statements2 reported findingsCorrect
The rectangle-ubiquity measure theorem and its shrinking-target and weighted Diophantine applications are correct after a fixed-constant repair to the printed covering construction. The repair changes no hypothesis, exponent, or conclusion.
The rectangle-ubiquity divergence principle is valid
Page 5 and Section 3 (pages 7--12) · measure-theory theorem and proof · arXiv:2303.17134v1
At level , ubiquity supplies on the order of separated large rectangles. The scaling property supplies on the order of small rectangles inside each. Their total measure is therefore comparable to The pair-correlation estimate decays geometrically when either family is regular. With the fixed enlargement constants repaired as described in Part 2, the Chung--Erdos bound gives a positive proportion in every ball, and doubling gives full measure.
The shrinking-target and weighted linear-form laws follow
Pages 5--6 and Sections 4--6 (pages 12--21) · Theorems 2.6--2.7 and corollary · arXiv:2303.17134v1
For digit-expansion targets the resonant rectangles tile the product space at every level, so the product series is exact. For simultaneous approximation and systems of linear forms, Minkowski's theorem supplies the rectangular ubiquity radii; the imposed geometric growth of the denominator bounds gives regularity. Substitution into the general product criterion yields the displayed convergence and divergence series.
02Proofs3 reported findingsContains incorrect or incomplete proofs
The printed proof incorrectly asserts that the fivefold enlargements selected by the covering lemma are disjoint. A verified repair replaces fixed enlargement factors and preserves every measure and correlation estimate. The Chung--Erdos denominator also omits its diagonal indices in one displayed statement, although the application includes them.
The covering lemma does not make the fivefold enlargements disjoint
Pages 8--9 · construction of the large and shrunk rectangle families · arXiv:2303.17134v1
The stated lemma produces a disjoint selected subfamily and the covering ; it does not imply that the sets are pairwise disjoint. The proof nevertheless claims pairwise disjointness of the fivefold large rectangles and, again, of the fivefold small rectangles. Apply the same lemma to the family of fivefold rectangles: the selected are disjoint and the original family is covered by the corresponding . In Step 1 the remain inside for all sufficiently large levels because every tends to zero. In Step 2 one may replace the displayed parent rectangle by a fixed enlargement of it; since , the lie in that enlargement. Ahlfors regularity and the scaling property change all resulting measures only by fixed constants. Every subsequent cardinality, intersection, series, and full-measure estimate therefore remains valid.
The displayed second-moment denominator excludes the diagonal
Page 7 · Lemma 3.1 · arXiv:2303.17134v1
The standard inequality has denominator , including . The paper prints , which is false for disjoint events. Step 4 separately retains the diagonal contribution , so changing the displayed index condition to all pairs is uniquely determined and makes the stated lemma agree with its actual use.
The repaired construction still gives the required quasi-independence
Pages 9--12 · Steps 3--4 · arXiv:2303.17134v1
Disjointness at the repaired fixed enlargement scale bounds the number of level- rectangles meeting a fixed level- rectangle. Splitting coordinates according to whether exceeds gives the two displayed factorizations. Regularity of or of supplies a geometric factor , whose double sum is bounded by the first moments, exactly as required by the corrected second-moment inequality.
03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings
No non-novelty findings.