Abstract

We give a very simple and explicit exposition of the effective results on ×a×b\times a\times b by Bourgain, Lindenstrauss, Michel and Venkatesh.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v2

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 20, 2026
01Statements3 reported findingsCorrect

The effective density theorem for the coprime semigroup and its inhomogeneous irrational corollary are correct. The displayed local sign and rounding slips do not change the claims.

Theorems 1–2Correct

The semigroup orbit has the stated triple-logarithmic density

Pages 2–3 and 9–11 · Theorems 1–2 and final proof · arXiv:2301.08212v2

The combinatorial covering lemma and the Fourier estimate create a long enough progression in the semigroup orbit. Dirichlet approximation then transfers the rational statement to infinitely many irrational approximants with an error smaller than the target density scale.

Full paper, version 2
Lemmas 1, 4, and 8Minor formal corrections · no status impact

Three ordering, rounding, and sign mismatches are local repairs

Pages 4, 6, and 9–10 · Lemmas 1, 4, and 8 · arXiv:2301.08212v2

The wrapped difference in Lemma 1 needs the opposite ordered pair in one branch; the block count in Lemma 4 must use a floor rather than a ceiling to preserve the lower size bound; and Lemma 8 requires y/a+γy/a^\ell+\gamma in accordance with its defining correspondence. Each replacement preserves the asserted set membership and estimates.

Final paragraphMinor formal correction · no status impact

The modular orbit must be read through fractional parts

Page 10 · conclusion of Theorem 1 · arXiv:2301.08212v2

The proof writes bw{qα}[0,1)b^w\{q\alpha\}\in[0,1) before reduction modulo one. The required identity is for its fractional part, or equivalently for distance modulo one. Making that reduction explicit gives the announced density statement.

02Proofs1 reported findingCorrect

The elementary combinatorial-Fourier proof is complete after the local branch, floor, sign, and fractional-part corrections.

Sections 2–6Correct and complete after the stated repairs

The progression and Fourier bounds combine with compatible scales

Pages 3–11 · lemmas and proof of Theorem 1 · arXiv:2301.08212v2

The corrected block sizes retain a positive proportion of residues, the exponential-sum estimate is applied on exactly those blocks, and the final modular reduction converts the resulting approximation into density on the circle. The irrational perturbation in Theorem 2 can be chosen strictly smaller than the available margin.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:2301.08212v2
Authors listed
Dmitry Gayfulin, Nikolay Moshchevitin
Audit date
August 20, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.