Abstract

Given a norm νν on R2\mathbb{R}^2, the set of νν-Dirichlet improvable numbers DIν\mathbf{DI}_ν was defined and studied in the papers of Andersen-Duke (Acta Arith. 2021) and Kleinbock-Rao (Internat. Math. Res. Notices 2022). When νν is the supremum norm, DIν=BAQ\mathbf{DI}_ν= \mathbf{BA}\cup \mathbb{Q}, where BA\mathbf{BA} is the set of badly approximable numbers. Each of the sets DIν\mathbf{DI}_ν, like BA\mathbf{BA}, is of measure zero and satisfies the winning property of Schmidt. Hence for every norm νν, BADIν\mathbf{BA} \cap \mathbf{DI}_ν is winning and thus has full Hausdorff dimension. In the present article we prove the following dichotomy phenomenon: either BADIν\mathbf{BA} \subset \mathbf{DI}_ν or else BADIν\mathbf{BA} \smallsetminus \mathbf{DI}_ν has full Hausdorff dimension. We give several examples for each of the two cases. The dichotomy is based on whether the critical locus of νν intersects a precompact gtg_t-orbit, where {gt}\{g_t\} is the one-parameter diagonal subgroup of SL2(R)\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{R}) acting on the space XX of unimodular lattices in R2\mathbb{R}^2. Thus the aforementioned dichotomy follows from the following dynamical statement: for a lattice ΛXΛ\in X, either gRΛg_\mathbb{R} Λ is unbounded (and then any precompact gR>0g_{\mathbb{R}_{>0}}-orbit must eventually avoid a neighborhood of ΛΛ), or not, in which case the set of lattices in XX whose gR>0g_{\mathbb{R}_{>0}}-trajectories are precompact and contain ΛΛ in their closure has full Hausdorff dimension.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v2

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 19, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsCorrect

The dynamical characterization and full-dimension dichotomy for badly approximable numbers outside norm-Dirichlet-improvable sets, together with the irreducible-norm result, are correct.

Theorems 1.3 and 1.5Correct

Precompact-orbit criterion and full-dimension dichotomy

Pages 3–4 · Theorems 1.3 and 1.5 · arXiv:2210.09299v2

The stable and unstable horospherical identities translate bounded continued-fraction data into avoidance of the norm's critical locus. If that locus meets a precompact diagonal orbit, the digit-block construction produces a full-dimensional subset of BADIνBA\setminus DI_\nu; the converse follows from the stated orbit criterion.

Full paper, version 2
Theorem 1.7Correct

Irreducible norms satisfy the required orbit condition

Pages 4–5 and Sections 2–4 · Theorem 1.7 · arXiv:2210.09299v2

The geometry of an irreducible unit ball supplies a critical lattice on a precompact orbit. Applying Theorem 1.5 then gives the full Hausdorff-dimension conclusion for every irreducible norm in the theorem.

02Proofs2 reported findingsCorrect

The homogeneous-dynamics identities, continued-fraction construction, and dimension estimate are correct. One continued-fraction tail repeats an index and is a harmless typo.

Sections 2–4Correct and complete

Orbit coding and the Cantor construction close

Sections 2–4 · arXiv:2210.09299v2

Stable/unstable coordinate formulas identify the forward and backward tails of the continued fraction. Prescribed bounded blocks force returns near the selected precompact orbit, while the free digits retain asymptotically full dimension through the cylinder conditional-probability estimate.

Continued-fraction tail notationTypo

The second tail digit repeats the first index

Section 4 · definition of x(wn+1,wn+2)x(w_{n+1},w_{n+2}) · arXiv:2210.09299v2

The tail is printed as [0;dn+1,dn+1,][0;d_{n+1},d_{n+1},\ldots]. Replace the second dn+1d_{n+1} by dn+2d_{n+2}. The arguments define the tail from the consecutive word wn+1,wn+2,w_{n+1},w_{n+2},\ldots, so this correction is unique and changes no estimate.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:2210.09299v2
Authors listed
Dmitry Kleinbock, Anurag Rao
Audit date
August 19, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.