arXiv:2205.01361v2

Inhomogeneous Diophantine approximation for generic homogeneous functions

Dmitry Kleinbock, Mishel Skenderi

math.NT11D7511J5411J8311H06

Abstract

The present paper is a sequel to [Monatsh. Math. 194 (2021), 523--554] in which results of that paper are generalized so that they hold in the setting of inhomogeneous Diophantine approximation. Given any integers n2n \geq 2 and 1\ell \geq 1, any ξ=(ξ1,,ξ)R\boldsymbol{ξ} = \left(ξ_1, \dots , ξ_\ell \right) \in \mathbb{R}^\ell, and any homogeneous function f=(f1,,f):RnRf = \left(f_1, \dots , f_\ell \right): \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}^\ell that satisfies a certain nonsingularity assumption, we obtain a biconditional criterion on the approximating function ψ=(ψ1,,ψ):R0(R>0)ψ= \left(ψ_1, \dots , ψ_\ell \right): \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} \to \left(\mathbb{R}_{>0}\right)^\ell for a generic element fgf \circ g in the SLn(R)\operatorname{SL}_n(\mathbb{R})-orbit of ff to be (respectively, not to be) ψψ-approximable at ξ=(ξ1,,ξn)\boldsymbol{ξ} = (ξ_1,\dots,ξ_n): that is, for there to exist infinitely many (respectively, only finitely many) vZn\mathbf{v} \in \mathbb{Z}^n such that ξj(fjg)(v)ψj(v)\left|ξ_j - \left( f_j \circ g\right)(\mathbf{v})\right| \leq ψ_j(\|\mathbf{v}\|) for each j{1,,}j \in \left\lbrace 1, \dots, \ell \right\rbrace. In this setting, we also obtain a sufficient condition for uniform approximation. We also consider some examples of ff that do not satisfy our nonsingularity assumptions and prove similar results for these examples. Moreover, one can replace SLn(R)\operatorname{SL}_n(\mathbb{R}) above by any closed subgroup of ASLn(R)\operatorname{ASL}_n(\mathbb{R}) that satisfies certain integrability axioms (being of Siegel and Rogers type) introduced by the authors in the aforementioned previous paper.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v2

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 19, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsCorrect

The generic inhomogeneous approximation and uniform-approximation theorems for homogeneous maps, together with the stated singular examples, are correct. One abstract coordinate count is a harmless notation typo.

Theorems 1.7 and 2.14Correct

The general inhomogeneous zero--one criterion is valid

Pages 3 and 8--12 · general asymptotic approximation theorem · arXiv:2205.01361v2

For the inhomogeneous target set Aξf,ψ,νA_{{}_{\boldsymbol\xi}f,\psi,\nu}, the Siegel-type axiom gives finiteness almost surely when its Euclidean volume is finite. When the volume is infinite, the Rogers-type deviation bound supplies almost-sure asymptotic lattice-point counting. Homogeneity and regularity compare all norms and scalar multiples needed to pass between the lattice orbit and the approximation definition.

Theorems 1.12--1.13Correct

The submersion and singular examples have the displayed tests

Pages 4--5 and Sections 3.1--3.3 · applications · arXiv:2205.01361v2

At a regular zero of a homogeneous map, the coarea formula gives shell volume comparable to tnd1jψj(t)t^{n-d-1}\prod_j\psi_j(t), yielding the stated integral. For products and coordinate maxima, direct Fubini integration produces the additional logarithmic or power factors, with separate zero and nonzero shift regimes. These volume asymptotics meet the hypotheses of the general theorems.

02Proofs3 reported findingsCorrect

The Siegel/Rogers reduction, volume comparison, coarea computation, and uniform Borel--Cantelli argument are correct and complete. The only identified defect is a mechanically repairable coordinate index in the abstract.

Section 2Correct and complete

The counting axioms imply both asymptotic and uniform approximation

Pages 5--12 · Lemma 2.9 and Theorems 2.14 and 2.17 · arXiv:2205.01361v2

The Siegel identity controls finite-volume targets, while the Rogers bound gives the normalized counting limit on infinite-volume targets. For uniform approximation, applying the deviation estimate to dyadic bounded targets gives failure probability bounded by the required negative power of target volume; the stated summability condition makes these failures finite almost surely. The regularity hypothesis fills the intervals between dyadic scales.

AbstractTypo

The shift vector is given the wrong number of displayed coordinates

Page 1 · abstract · arXiv:2205.01361v2

The abstract first defines ξ=(ξ1,,ξ)R\boldsymbol\xi=(\xi_1,\ldots,\xi_\ell)\in\mathbb R^\ell but later writes the same vector as (ξ1,,ξn)(\xi_1,\ldots,\xi_n). Every definition and theorem uses \ell target components, so replacing the terminal nn by \ell is uniquely determined and has no mathematical effect.

Section 3Correct and complete

The volume asymptotics are uniform in the shift where claimed

Pages 12--18 · coarea and example computations · arXiv:2205.01361v2

Homogeneity reduces each dyadic shell to a fixed annulus. At regular level sets, compactness and the submersion hypothesis bound the coarea density above and below uniformly; the translated target remains in the same compact range after rescaling. The singular examples are integrated explicitly and the proofs keep the zero-shift and nonzero-shift cases separate.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:2205.01361v2
Authors listed
Dmitry Kleinbock, Mishel Skenderi
Audit date
August 19, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.