arXiv:2202.11212v1

Metrical properties for the weighted products of multiple partial quotients in continued fractions

Ayreena Bakhtawar, Mumtaz Hussain, Dmitry Kleinbock, Bao-Wei Wang

math.NTmath.DS

Abstract

The classical Khintchine and Jarník theorems, generalizations of a consequence of Dirichlet's theorem, are fundamental results in the theory of Diophantine approximation. These theorems are concerned with the size of the set of real numbers for which the partial quotients in their continued fraction expansions grows with a certain rate. Recently it was observed that the growth of product of pairs of consecutive partial quotients in the continued fraction expansion of a real number is associated with improvements to Dirichlet's theorem. In this paper we consider the products of several consecutive partial quotients raised to different powers. Namely, we find the Lebesgue measure and the Hausdorff dimension of the following set: Dt(ψ):={x[0,1):i=0m1an+iti(x)Ψ(n) for infinitely many nN}, D_{\mathbf t}(ψ):=\left\{x\in[0, 1): \prod\limits_{i=0}^{m-1}{a^{t_i}_{n+i}(x)} \ge Ψ(n)\ {\text{for infinitely many}} \ n\in \mathbb{N} \right\}, where tiR+t_i\in\mathbb R_+ for all 0im1{0\leq i\leq m-1}, and Ψ:NR1Ψ:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R}_{\ge 1} is a positive function.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v1

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 19, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsCorrect

The Lebesgue-measure dichotomy and Hausdorff-dimension results for the weighted products of consecutive continued-fraction partial quotients are correct.

Theorems 1.4 and 1.5Correct

Zero-one and endpoint dimension laws

Pages 3–4 · Theorems 1.4–1.5 · arXiv:2202.11212v1

Cylinder lengths and conditional Gauss-measure estimates reduce the limsup condition to the stated series. Borel–Cantelli and quasi-independence give the measure dichotomy, while the covering and Cantor constructions yield dimension 11 at one endpoint and 00 at the other.

Full paper, version 1
Theorem 1.6Correct

The two-factor intermediate dimension formula

Page 4 and Sections 4–5 · Theorem 1.6 · arXiv:2202.11212v1

For two consecutive denominators the continued-fraction recurrence converts the growth condition to an explicit constraint on adjacent digits. The upper pressure estimate and the matching block construction give the same critical exponent, establishing the formula in the theorem.

02Proofs2 reported findingsCorrect

The measure and dimension arguments are correct. The initial values printed for the convergent recurrence are a harmless, uniquely repairable typo.

Sections 2–5Correct and complete

Cylinder estimates support both measure and dimension claims

Sections 2–5 · arXiv:2202.11212v1

The proof uses the standard continuant identities to obtain uniform cylinder ratios, then separates overlapping events before applying the second Borel–Cantelli estimate. The dimension upper bound and Cantor lower bound use compatible block scales and converge to the same exponent.

Continued-fraction preliminariesTypo

The initial convergents are printed in the wrong order

Page 5 · recurrence for pn/qnp_n/q_n · arXiv:2202.11212v1

The text prints (p1,q1)=(0,1)(p_{-1},q_{-1})=(0,1) and (p0,q0)=(1,1)(p_0,q_0)=(1,1). Replace them by the standard values (p1,q1)=(1,0)(p_{-1},q_{-1})=(1,0) and (p0,q0)=(0,1)(p_0,q_0)=(0,1). The subsequent recurrence and every displayed cylinder identity use exactly these standard initial values, so the correction is mechanically determined and does not change an argument.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:2202.11212v1
Authors listed
Ayreena Bakhtawar, Mumtaz Hussain, Dmitry Kleinbock, Bao-Wei Wang
Audit date
August 19, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.