arXiv:2108.08778v2
Abstract
We prove a new result about the mutual behavior of irrationality measure functions for different real numbers .
AI-generated audit
Audit summary
Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.
Current report
Detailed mathematical audit
01Statements3 reported findingsCorrect
The criteria and constructions for best approximations to real numbers are correct. Several denominator labels in the case analysis are local notation slips.
The simultaneous and dual best-approximation criteria have the stated form
Pages 2–13 · Theorems 1–3 and their proofs · arXiv:2108.08778v2
The convex-body minima translate bounded approximation constants into bounded ratios of successive best-approximation scales, and conversely. The recursive denominator construction separates each prescribed competitor and realizes the announced behavior.
Full paper, version 2 ↗Three denominator labels and one count require local correction
Pages 4–11 · proofs of Theorems 1–3 · arXiv:2108.08778v2
The second case of Theorem 1 must count admissible points. In Theorem 3, the prose swaps the two discontinuity denominators before returning to the correct common denominators. In the construction, the comparison in (32) is between the current common denominator and the two successive -indices; restoring those labels gives the displayed inequality.
The construction realizes the sharp order of the permutation bound
Pages 2 and 8–13 · Theorem 2 and Section 6 · arXiv:2108.08778v2
The prescribed interlacing sequence determines continued fractions for the individual numbers and for each paired auxiliary number. The asymptotic denominator identities order all irrationality-measure functions into exactly the announced cyclic permutations. The special case and the general index pattern satisfy the same inequalities, so the construction gives numbers with only eventual permutations.
02Proofs1 reported findingCorrect
The geometric-minima arguments and realizing construction are complete after the denominator and counting labels are corrected.
The corrected counts and denominator ordering close each case
Pages 3–13 · main proofs · arXiv:2108.08778v2
The corrected ceiling count restores the claimed lower bound without changing its constant order. The common-denominator comparisons in the construction strictly order the next approximation errors, which is the only property needed in the induction.
03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings
No non-novelty findings.