Abstract

Three qq-versions of Lommel polynomials are studied. Included are explicit representations, recurrences, continued fractions, and connections to associated Askey--Wilson polynomials. Combinatorial results are emphasized, including a general theorem when RIR_I moments coincide with orthogonal polynomial moments. The combinatorial results use weighted Motzkin paths, Schröder paths, and parallelogram polyominoes.

Dependence graphs

Proof lineage

On qq-real and qq-complex numbers

A statement-restricted proof-dependence graph for arXiv:2508.08440v2. It covers the paper's main analytic continuation and convergence theorems, exact $q$-Bessel formulas, monotonicity and almost-everywhere singularity, the unit-circle Jones/Burau bounds, the mod-$m$ classification results, and the hypergeometric construction of $q$-complex numbers. Expansion follows only claims whose truth can affect one of those marked results and stops at published books. Historical citations, comparisons, conjectures, and alternate routes are documented separately as non-edges.

Open dependence graph →

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v3

Not a correctness certificate. A green “no issues found” result may include yellow suspected typos or minor formal issues that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 27, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsNo statement issues found

The three families of qq-Lommel polynomials, their explicit representations and recurrences, the continued-fraction formulas, the associated Askey-Wilson identifications, and the stated combinatorial interpretations are coherent at the stated generic-parameter scope. The specialized continued fraction in Equation (6.4), which is the MathAudit dependency, is correct.

Theorem 5.3 and Equation (6.4)No issue found

The basic-Bessel continued fraction has the stated normalization

PDF pages 14–19 · Theorem 5.3 and Equation (6.4) · arXiv:2105.10096v3

Theorem 5.3 gives the ratio of contiguous basic hypergeometric solutions as the Jacobi continued fraction determined by the displayed three-term recurrence. The specialization in Section 6 cancels the common prefactor and yields Equation (6.4) with numerator terms xyqjx y q^j and denominator shifts 1−qjy1-q^j y. Substituting y↦y/qy\mapsto y/q and x↦x/qx\mapsto x/q gives the exact formula quoted as Lemma 3.1 in arXiv:2508.08440v2.

Exact arXiv version 3 ↗
Sections 2–4 and 7–8No issue found

The recurrence and combinatorial families agree

PDF pages 3–13 and 20–24 · arXiv:2105.10096v3

For each family, the explicit polynomial sum satisfies the same recurrence and initial values as the corresponding denominator polynomials. The weighted Motzkin-, Schröder-, and polyomino-enumeration formulas reproduce those recurrences, including the endpoint weights, so the algebraic and combinatorial descriptions are compatible.

02Proofs2 reported findingsNo proof issues found

The recurrence comparisons, finite-continuant identities, basic-hypergeometric contiguous relation, and weighted-path bijections close the advertised arguments. The proof-critical Equation (6.4) is independently derived inside the paper rather than merely attributed to an inaccessible predecessor.

Proof of Theorem 5.3No issue found in the reviewed proof

Coefficient comparison proves the required contiguous relation

PDF pages 14–16 · arXiv:2105.10096v3

After normalizing the two contiguous series, coefficient comparison gives the displayed three-term relation. Pincherle's continued-fraction mechanism then identifies the solution ratio because the minimal solution and the initial quotient have the required formal expansions. Specializing the parameters produces the Section 6 fraction without an unproved limit interchange.

Exact arXiv version 3 ↗
Combinatorial proofsNo issue found in the reviewed proof

The path decompositions preserve every recurrence weight

PDF pages 7–13 and 20–24 · arXiv:2105.10096v3

The first-return decompositions separate level, up-down, and long-horizontal steps with exactly the recurrence coefficients printed for the polynomial families. Boundary cases match the initial polynomials, and the subsequent path-to-polyomino maps preserve the area and step statistics used in the generating functions.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo novelty concerns found

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:2105.10096v3
Authors listed
Jang Soo Kim, Dennis Stanton
Audit date
August 27, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.