arXiv:2103.12113v2

On transference principle and Nesterenko's linear independence criterion

Oleg N. German, Nikolay G. Moshchevitin

math.NT

Abstract

We consider the problem of simultaneous approximation of real numbers θ1,,θnθ_1, \ldots,θ_n with rationals and the dual problem of approximating zero with the values of the linear form x0+θ1x1++θnxnx_0+θ_1x_1+\ldots+θ_nx_n at integer points. In this setting we analyse two transference inequalities obtained by Schmidt and Summerer. We present a rather simple geometric observation, which proves their result. We also derive several corollaries previously unknown. Particularly, we show that, together with the transference inequalities for uniform exponents, Schmidt and Summerer's inequalities imply the inequalities by Bugeaud and Laurent and "one half" of the inequalities by Marnat and Moshchevitin. Besides that, we show that our main construction provides a rather simple proof of Nesterenko's linear independence criterion.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v2

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 20, 2026
01Statements3 reported findingsCorrect

The transference inequality and the application to Nesterenko's linear-independence criterion are correct. One signed-distance definition is printed as an unsigned distance and is treated as a notation typo.

Main transference theorem and Nesterenko corollaryCorrect

The exponent and dimension conclusions follow from the empty-cylinder construction

Pages 3 and 8–13 · main theorems and application · arXiv:2103.12113v2

Successive empty cylinders produce linearly independent lattice vectors with the required determinant control. Applying the dual convex-body estimate to the prescribed sequence of linear forms gives the announced lower bound for the rational dimension.

Full paper, version 2
Empty-cylinder lemmaTypo · no status impact

The height coordinate must be signed on the chosen half-cylinder

Pages 8–9 · empty-cylinder lemma and its figure · arXiv:2103.12113v2

The text defines h(x)h(x) as an unsigned distance, making the cylinder centrally symmetric, but immediately uses h(x)>0h(x)>0 on one half and later writes the union with its negative. Define hh as the oriented coordinate along the distinguished line, or define the displayed set as the positive half-cylinder. The figure and every application use that intended one-sided object.

Propositions 1–3Correct

The exponent transference consequences follow from the main inequality

Pages 5–8 · Propositions 1–3 and Corollaries 1–2 · arXiv:2103.12113v2

Substituting the ordinary and uniform simultaneous and dual exponents into the two cases of the empty-cylinder inequality gives the ratios in Proposition 1. Taking the appropriate maximum and minimum yields Proposition 2 and its corollaries, while the elementary comparison of the resulting factors proves Proposition 3. The parameter ranges used in each substitution match the definitions.

02Proofs1 reported findingCorrect

The proof is complete once the empty cylinder is read with its intended signed height; no estimate depends on the erroneous unsigned notation.

Sections 3–5Correct and complete after the stated repair

The one-sided cylinder and determinant estimates are compatible

Pages 8–13 · geometric construction and Nesterenko application · arXiv:2103.12113v2

With the signed height, the chosen half-cylinder contains no nonzero lattice point and its negative handles the opposite orientation. Minkowski's theorem, the determinant lower bound, and the limiting exponent calculation then apply exactly as written.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:2103.12113v2
Authors listed
Oleg N. German, Nikolay G. Moshchevitin
Audit date
August 20, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.