arXiv:2001.05174v4
Abstract
Let be a Lie group, a discrete subgroup, , and an affine map from to itself. We give conditions on a submanifold of guaranteeing that the set of points with -trajectories avoiding is hyperplane absolute winning (a property which implies full Hausdorff dimension and is stable under countable intersections). A similar result is proved for one-parameter actions on . This has applications to constructing exceptional geodesics on locally symmetric spaces, and to non-density of the set of values of certain functions at integer points.
AI-generated audit
Audit summary
Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.
Current report
Detailed mathematical audit
01Statements3 reported findingsCorrect
The hyperplane-absolute-winning orbit-avoidance theorems, their geodesic-flow consequences, and the generalized-indefinite-binary-form application are correct as stated.
Transversal targets have hyperplane-absolute-winning exceptional sets
Pages 3 and 10–17 · Theorems A1–A2 and Theorems 2.6–2.8 · arXiv:2001.05174v4
The polynomial projection onto the maximally expanding Jordan directions produces an abelian subgroup. Uniform growth outside its kernel reduces each dangerous inverse image of a transversal target to a controlled neighborhood of an affine hyperplane. The hyperplane-percentage strategy deletes a fixed positive fraction of those neighborhoods at every scale, and the equivalence with the hyperplane absolute game gives the stated HAW conclusion. Compact exhaustion and countable-intersection stability cover noncompact targets without changing the hypotheses.
Nondense geodesic conclusions on locally symmetric spaces
Pages 4 and 28–31 · Theorems B1–B2 and their proofs · arXiv:2001.05174v4
The homogeneous-space model identifies the relevant sphere of initial directions with a compact-group orbit. The maximally expanding horospherical direction is transverse to each point target, so Theorem A2 gives a thick set of avoiding directions. For a finite subset of an ergodic submanifold, a finite intersection of the corresponding HAW sets is nonempty on every fiber; taking the orbit closure gives a closed invariant set disjoint from the prescribed points and projecting onto the base.
Value-avoidance for generalized indefinite binary forms
Pages 5 and 31–37 · Theorem C, Theorem 6.3, and Section 7 · arXiv:2001.05174v4
Condition (IB-2) makes a bounded value along an integer vector force the associated lattice orbit into a compactness obstruction, while (IB-3) writes every nonzero level set as a countable union of invariant transverse submanifolds. Theorem A2 applies to each such component, and HAW stability under countable intersections yields avoidance of every value in the prescribed countable set throughout the orbit .
02Proofs4 reported findingsCorrect
The Jordan-growth lemmas, the hyperplane-game construction, and both application chains are correct and complete. Two local Jordan-block display slips have uniquely determined repairs and do not affect any argument.
Jordan growth and the hyperplane-game proof
Pages 6–27 · Lemmas 2.2–4.7 and proof of Theorem 2.6 · arXiv:2001.05174v4
The polynomial kills all submaximal Jordan blocks and extracts the leading coordinate of each maximal block. Lemmas 3.2–3.5 give uniform two-sided growth and convergence to that projection on compact sets away from its kernel. Transversality then gives a uniform angle from the dangerous tangent spaces, and the local multiplication estimates preserve that angle at the game scale. The resulting deletions satisfy the percentage-game rules and exclude every future hit on the target.
Geodesic and value-distribution applications
Pages 28–40 · proofs of Theorems B1, B2, and C · arXiv:2001.05174v4
The identifications of tangent directions and lattice orbits preserve the relevant avoidance conditions. The subgroup transversality checks use the direct root-space decompositions, while compact/countable exhaustion is justified by countable stability of HAW sets. The GIBF argument separately handles the zero level through (IB-2) and every nonzero level through (IB-3), so no value or parameter case is omitted.
The number of leading Jordan blocks is labeled by the wrong symbol
Page 7 · Equation (2.4) · arXiv:2001.05174v4
After Equation (2.3), exactly the first Jordan blocks have both maximal spectral modulus and maximal size, but Equation (2.4) labels the repeated blocks as occurring times. Replace by . The kernel and image formulas (2.5)–(2.6) already use , so the intended correction is unique and every later argument is unchanged.
The final Jordan-block estimate drops its normalizing binomial factor
Page 14 · final paragraph of the proof of Lemma 3.4 · arXiv:2001.05174v4
For , the exact coefficient formula still contains , but the displayed upper bound omits that factor and the next sentence says . The ordering in Equation (2.3) also permits with . Restore the omitted factor in the bound. If , exponential decay gives the limit; if , then and . These are immediate consequences of the preceding exact formula and the stated block ordering, so the correction is unique and the uniform convergence conclusion is unchanged.
03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings
No non-novelty findings.