arXiv:1701.04139v2

An application of lattice points counting to shrinking target problems

Dmitry Kleinbock, Xi Zhao

math.DS37D4053D2537A25

Abstract

We apply lattice points counting results of Gorodnik and Nevo to solve a shrinking target problem in the setting of geodesic flows on hyperbolic manifolds of finite volume.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v2

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 19, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsCorrect

The convergence and divergence shrinking-target laws for discrete geodesic flow on finite-volume hyperbolic manifolds are correct under the stated monotonicity and rate conditions.

Theorems 1.1 and 1.2Correct

The zero-one shrinking-target laws are correct

Pages 2–4 and 11–16 · Theorems 1.1–1.2 · arXiv:1701.04139v2

Convergence of the target-volume sum gives the finite-hit conclusion directly by Borel-Cantelli. In the divergent case, the stated lower-rate condition makes the lattice-counting error negligible relative to the main term, yielding the required quasi-independence.

Full paper, version 2
Theorem 1.3Correct

The block-sum generalization has the correct quantitative hypothesis

Pages 4–5 and 14–16 · Theorem 1.3 · arXiv:1701.04139v2

The theorem isolates exactly the block lower bound needed for the second-moment argument. The earlier radius condition is then verified as a sufficient special case, rather than being silently used in the general statement.

02Proofs2 reported findingsCorrect

The lattice-point estimate and dynamical Borel-Cantelli argument are correct and complete.

Theorem 2.2Correct and complete

The abstract second-moment criterion is applied with the right error term

Pages 5–7 · Theorem 2.2 · arXiv:1701.04139v2

Pair intersections are compared with products of target measures plus the counting error, and the resulting variance is little-o of the square of the cumulative expectation on the stated blocks. This gives infinitely many hits almost surely.

Sections 3–4Correct and complete

Hyperbolic lattice counting supplies every geometric estimate

Pages 7–16 · counting theorems and completion · arXiv:1701.04139v2

The fundamental-domain decomposition treats compact and cuspidal pieces uniformly, the main term matches hyperbolic ball volume, and the exponential error is inserted with the correct radius dependence. The final summation covers both the concrete and block formulations.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:1701.04139v2
Authors listed
Dmitry Kleinbock, Xi Zhao
Audit date
August 19, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.