arXiv:1510.06214v3
Abstract
We give an elementary proof of a recent result by Fishman, Kleinbock, Merrill and Simmons about rational points on quadratic surfaces.
AI-generated audit
Audit summary
Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.
Current report
Detailed mathematical audit
01Statements3 reported findingsCorrect
The effective rational-approximation conclusions for isotropic quadratic forms are mathematically supported for sufficiently large . The printed range has a small-denominator boundary exception and needs a simple global range correction.
The effective quadratic-surface approximation estimate is verified in its operative range
Sections 1 and 3-4 · Satz 1 and its proof · arXiv:1510.06214v3
Minkowski's successive-minima bound and Cassels' small-zero theorem produce a nonzero integral isotropic vector in . The hyperbolic automorphism then gives and ; taking yields the displayed constant whenever is in the large-parameter range used by the inequalities.
The lower endpoint is false for forms with no denominator-one rational point
Sections 1 and 4 · hypotheses of Satz 1 and Satz 2 · arXiv:1510.06214v3
Let . Then is isotropic because , and . For , however, the conclusion requires and , which is impossible. Replacing by , as the proof itself requires, repairs both main statements without affecting their asymptotic content.
The independent-points extension follows from the cited small-zero theorem
Section 5 · Satz 2 and Schulze-Pillot theorem · arXiv:1510.06214v3
Applying the stated Schulze-Pillot bound to the induced integral quadratic form supplies linearly independent isotropic coefficient vectors with effective heights. Their images remain independent and lie in one effective dilation of the same approximation body, so the calculation for Satz 1 applies to each. The only necessary change is the same lower cutoff on .
02Proofs3 reported findingsCorrect
The geometry-of-numbers and isotropic-zero arguments are complete after restricting the small external parameter range; repeated display labels and coordinate slips are typographical only.
Both cases produce an effective integral isotropic point
Section 3 · equations (16)-(22) · arXiv:1510.06214v3
If the first minimum is below one, integrality and force . Otherwise Minkowski bounds the last minimum; pulling back the isotropic form to a lattice basis and applying Cassels bounds a nonzero isotropic combination. The coefficient and dilation estimates combine to the stated .
The proof implicitly requires a lower bound on
Section 4 · equations (25)-(29) and · arXiv:1510.06214v3
The step requires bounded away from zero. Thus it proves the conclusion only once exceeds a form-dependent constant. This matches the explicit denominator obstruction above and is repaired by changing the displayed range everywhere it is used.
Three local display errors have unique corrections
Section 4 · definition of , the bound for , and the expansion of · arXiv:1510.06214v3
The definition of is missing a closing denominator brace; the bound printed as must be ; and one expansion starts with the nonexistent coordinate instead of . The immediately following calculations use the corrected expressions.
03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings
No non-novelty findings.