arXiv:1509.05439v3

Intrinsic Diophantine approximation on manifolds: General theory

Lior Fishman, Dmitry Kleinbock, Keith Merrill, David Simmons

math.NT

Abstract

We investigate the question of how well points on a nondegenerate kk-dimensional submanifold MRdM \subseteq \mathbb R^d can be approximated by rationals also lying on MM, establishing an upper bound on the "intrinsic Dirichlet exponent" for MM. We show that relative to this exponent, the set of badly intrinsically approximable points is of full dimension and the set of very well intrinsically approximable points is of zero measure. Our bound on the intrinsic Dirichlet exponent is phrased in terms of an explicit function of kk and dd which does not seem to have appeared in the literature previously. It is shown to be optimal for several particular cases. The requirement that the rationals lie on MM distinguishes this question from the more common context of (ambient) Diophantine approximation on manifolds, and necessitates the development of new techniques. Our main tool is an analogue of the Simplex Lemma for rationals lying on MM which provides new insights on the local distribution of rational points on nondegenerate manifolds.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v3

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 19, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsCorrect

The full-dimension theorem for intrinsically badly approximable points on nondegenerate manifolds and the nullity theorem for intrinsically very well approximable points are correct.

Theorem 1.3Correct

Full dimension of intrinsic bad approximation

Pages 3–5 and Sections 3–4 · Theorem 1.3 · arXiv:1509.05439v3

The intrinsic simplex lemma places all sufficiently low-height rational points near a proper algebraic set on each small parameter ball. The algebraic-set game lets the player avoid that set at every scale, and nondegeneracy converts winning in parameter space to full Hausdorff dimension on the manifold.

Full paper, version 3
Theorem 1.5Correct

Intrinsic very well approximable points are null

Pages 5–6 and Section 4 · Theorem 1.5 · arXiv:1509.05439v3

The simplex lemma and the manifold's local volume bounds give a summable cover at every exponent strictly better than the intrinsic Dirichlet exponent. Borel–Cantelli then makes the corresponding limsup set null in each coordinate chart, and a countable chart cover gives the global claim.

02Proofs2 reported findingsCorrect

The simplex lemma, algebraic-set winning construction, and measure-covering argument are correct and complete.

Lemma 4.1 and Theorem 4.3Correct and complete

The simplex bound supports the winning strategy

Section 4 · Lemma 4.1 and Theorem 4.3 · arXiv:1509.05439v3

The determinant estimate forces rational points below the height threshold into the announced algebraic hypersurface. At each game scale the player deletes its controlled neighborhood; nondegeneracy prevents the parameter chart from lying in that hypersurface and preserves a legal response.

Theorem 4.5Correct and complete

The null-set cover has a convergent total measure

Section 4 · Theorem 4.5 · arXiv:1509.05439v3

Rational points are grouped by height, the simplex lemma reduces each group to controlled neighborhoods, and local regularity bounds their measure. The improved exponent supplies a geometric decay factor, so summing over groups and charts proves nullity without an omitted endpoint case.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:1509.05439v3
Authors listed
Lior Fishman, Dmitry Kleinbock, Keith Merrill, David Simmons
Audit date
August 19, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.