arXiv:1507.07119v2

Badly approximable points in twisted Diophantine approximation and Hausdorff dimension

Paloma Bengoechea, Nikolay Moshchevitin

math.NT

Abstract

For any j1,,jn>0j_1,\ldots,j_n>0 with j1++jn=1j_1+\cdots+j_n=1 and any xRnx\in\mathbb{R}^n, we consider the set of points yRny\in\mathbb{R}^n for which max1inqxiyi1/ji>c/q\max_{1\leq i\leq n}\lVert qx_i-y_i\rVert^{1/j_i}>c/q for some positive constant c=c(y)c=c(y) and all qNq\in\mathbb{N}. These sets are the twisted inhomogeneous analogue of Bad(j1,,jn)\operatorname{Bad}(j_1,\ldots,j_n) in the theory of simultaneous Diophantine approximation. It has been shown that they have full Hausdorff dimension in the non-weighted setting, i.e. when ji=1/nj_i=1/n, and in the weighted setting when xx is chosen from Bad(j1,,jn)\operatorname{Bad}(j_1,\ldots,j_n). We generalise these results, proving full Hausdorff dimension in the weighted setting without any condition on xx.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v2

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 20, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsCorrect

The full Hausdorff-dimension theorem for weighted twisted badly approximable points, including simultaneous coordinatewise badness, is supported for every twist vector.

Theorem 1.1Correct

The intersection has full ambient Hausdorff dimension

Sections 1 and 4-6 · Theorem 1.1 and Cantor construction · arXiv:1507.07119v2

For each large subdivision parameter RR, the construction removes hyperrectangles meeting either a dual best-approximation resonance or a coordinate rational resonance. Each weighted parent has RR children, and the paper's exact lower count is RiRjiO((1+logR)R1jmin)R-\sum_i R^{j_i}-O((1+\log R)R^{1-j_{\min}}), which is positive for large RR. The resulting mass estimate tends to exponent nn as RR\to\infty, proving the stated dimension.

Proposition 3.1Correct

Dual avoidance implies twisted bad approximation

Section 3 · Proposition 3.1 and inequalities (8)-(11) · arXiv:1507.07119v2

Choosing consecutive dual best approximations so that qq lies between their reciprocal errors makes the term qζνq\zeta_\nu small. Minkowski's inequality ζνMν+11\zeta_\nu M_{\nu+1}\leq1 then converts the fixed lower bound on mνη\|m_\nu\cdot\eta\| into a uniform positive lower bound for maxiqjiqθiηi\max_i q^{j_i}\|q\theta_i-\eta_i\|.

02Proofs2 reported findingsCorrect

The best-approximation, removal-count, and mass-distribution steps consistently yield the claimed dimension without an unproved case split.

Lemma 2.2Correct

The weighted best-approximation heights are quantitatively lacunary

Section 2 · Lemma 2.2 · arXiv:1507.07119v2

A doubled weighted approximation body is covered by 3n3^n translates of the preceding body. The best-approximation minimality bounds the lattice points in those translates and yields Mν+23n2MνM_{\nu+2\cdot3^n}\geq2M_\nu, which is the exact finite-per-scale estimate later used.

Sections 4-6Correct and complete

The Cantor measure supplies the full lower dimension

Sections 4-6 · child counts, Lemma 5.1, and final dimension bound · arXiv:1507.07119v2

The hyperplane and coordinate resonances intersect only the explicitly counted children. Assigning equal mass to survivors gives μ(S)Ss(R)\mu(S)\ll |S|^{s(R)} for sufficiently small cubes, where s(R)ns(R)\to n. The mass distribution principle therefore gives dimension at least nn, matching the ambient upper bound.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:1507.07119v2
Authors listed
Paloma Bengoechea, Nikolay Moshchevitin
Audit date
August 20, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.