arXiv:1407.5310v2

Singular systems of linear forms and non-escape of mass in the space of lattices

S. Kadyrov, D. Y. Kleinbock, E. Lindenstrauss, G. A. Margulis

math.DSmath.NT

Abstract

Singular systems of linear forms were introduced by Khintchine in the 1920s, and it was shown by Dani in the 1980s that they are in one-to-one correspondence with certain divergent orbits of one- parameter diagonal groups on the space of lattices. We give a (conjecturally sharp) upper bound on the Hausdorff dimension of singular systems of linear forms (equivalently the set of points with divergent trajectories) as well as the dimension of the set of points with trajectories 'escaping on average' (a notion weaker than divergence). This extends work by Cheung, as well as by Chevallier and Cheung, on the vector case. Our method differs considerably from that of Cheung and Chevallier, and is based on the method of integral inequalities developed by Eskin, Margulis and Mozes.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v2

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 19, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsCorrect

The Hausdorff-dimension upper bound for singular systems, the entropy estimate, and the non-escape-of-mass consequences are correct.

Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.2Correct

The escape-on-average dimension bound is correct

Pages 3–4 and 6–17 · Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.2 · arXiv:1407.5310v2

The covering estimate charges a fixed dimensional loss for each prescribed proportion of time outside a compact set. Under the Dani correspondence, singular matrices give complete escape on average, and insertion of the unstable-leaf dimension yields the displayed codimension.

Full paper, version 2
Theorems 1.3 and 1.4Correct

The entropy and limiting-mass inequalities are correct

Pages 4–5 and 17–25 · Theorems 1.3–1.4 · arXiv:1407.5310v2

The compactly supported entropy estimate bounds the mass that can remain near the cusp, and upper semicontinuity on the compact part gives the stated lower bound on the mass of a weak limit. The normalization of entropy and the lost mass agree in the two statements.

02Proofs2 reported findingsCorrect

The combinatorial covering, height-function contraction, and entropy arguments are correct and complete.

Proof of Theorem 1.1Correct and complete

The multi-scale covers produce the claimed codimension

Pages 6–17 · proof of Theorem 1.1 · arXiv:1407.5310v2

Orbit segments are coded by their cusp visits, the number and diameter of covering boxes are bounded uniformly, and summing over visit patterns gives the announced Hausdorff exponent. The passage from finite blocks to limsup frequency is explicit.

Proofs of Theorems 1.3 and 1.4Correct and complete

Entropy controls escape of mass with the correct coefficient

Pages 17–25 · entropy and weak-limit proofs · arXiv:1407.5310v2

The height-function contraction creates a compact partition with controlled cusp atoms, and the entropy contribution of those atoms is bounded before taking limits. The ergodic decomposition and approximation steps preserve the coefficient appearing in the final mass inequality.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:1407.5310v2
Authors listed
S. Kadyrov, D. Y. Kleinbock, E. Lindenstrauss, G. A. Margulis
Audit date
August 19, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.