arXiv:1405.7650v6

Intrinsic Diophantine approximation on quadric hypersurfaces

Lior Fishman, Dmitry Kleinbock, Keith Merrill, David Simmons

math.NTmath.DS11K6037A17

Abstract

We consider the question of how well points in a quadric hypersurface MRdM\subset\mathbb R^d can be approximated by rational points of QdM\mathbb Q^d\cap M. This contrasts with the more common setup of approximating points in a manifold by all rational points in Qd\mathbb Q^d. We provide complete answers to major questions of Diophantine approximation in this context. Of particular interest are the impact of the real and rational ranks of the defining quadratic form, quantities whose roles in Diophantine approximation have never been previously elucidated. Our methods include a correspondence between the intrinsic Diophantine approximation theory on a rational quadric hypersurface and the dynamics of the group of projective transformations which preserve that hypersurface, similar to earlier results in the non-intrinsic setting due to Dani ('86) and Kleinbock--Margulis ('99).

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v6

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 19, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsCorrect

The intrinsic Dirichlet theorem by rational rank, full-dimension theorem for intrinsically badly approximable points, and Khintchine-type theorem on nonsingular rational quadrics are correct.

Theorem 5.1Correct

Intrinsic Dirichlet theorem for rational quadrics

Section 5 · Theorem 5.1 · arXiv:1405.7650v6

The correspondence sends rational points on the quadric to primitive isotropic vectors and approximation quality to cusp depth. Reduction theory supplies such a vector at every sufficiently large height with the exponent dictated by the rational rank, including the separate anisotropic cases stated in the theorem.

Full paper, version 6
Theorems 4.5 and 6.3Correct

Badly approximable dimension and Khintchine law

Sections 4 and 6–8 · Theorems 4.5 and 6.3 · arXiv:1405.7650v6

Bounded trajectories in the orthogonal homogeneous space characterize intrinsic bad approximation, and the winning construction gives full dimension. For the metric theorem, reduction theory identifies the cusp tail, and the exponentially mixing shrinking-target theorem converts its measure asymptotics into the displayed convergence-divergence law, with the exceptional low-rank case treated separately.

02Proofs2 reported findingsCorrect

The intrinsic dynamical correspondence, reduction-theoretic cusp estimates, winning argument, and shrinking-target proof are correct and complete.

Sections 3–5Correct and complete

Rational approximation is equivalent to orthogonal cusp excursions

Sections 3–5 · Corollary 4.3 and Theorems 4.5, 5.1 · arXiv:1405.7650v6

The chosen normalization identifies projective height with the relevant lattice-vector coordinate up to uniform constants. Mahler compactness turns a lower vector bound into boundedness, and the rank cases in the reduction argument give exactly the stated Dirichlet functions.

Sections 7–8Correct and complete

Cusp tails satisfy the Borel–Cantelli hypotheses

Sections 7–8 · Theorem 7.4 and Proposition 8.9 · arXiv:1405.7650v6

The height function is distance-like, its tail has the computed exponential order, and the diagonal flow is exponentially mixing on each relevant homogeneous component. Substitution of the approximation function into this tail integral gives the series in Theorem 6.3, including the explicitly isolated exceptional form.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:1405.7650v6
Authors listed
Lior Fishman, Dmitry Kleinbock, Keith Merrill, David Simmons
Audit date
August 19, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.