arXiv:1201.4232v2
Abstract
We give some comments on W.M. Schmidt's theorem on Diophantine approximations with positive integers and our recent results on the topic.
AI-generated audit
Audit summary
Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.
Current report
Detailed mathematical audit
01Statements2 reported findingsCorrect
The optimized positive-integer exponent bound and the comparison with the counterexample are correct.
Optimized lower bound for the positive exponent
Pages 2-3 · equations (5)-(6) and Theorem 2 · arXiv:1201.4232v2
Optimizing Schmidt's two alternatives under produces the two regimes . Their boundary agrees, and the resulting maximum is exactly the displayed pair and .
Full paper, version 2 ↗The counterexample exponent comparison is consistent
Page 3 · Theorem 3 and the calculation following it · arXiv:1201.4232v2
The stated values of and put the constructed pair in , and direct substitution gives the weaker universal bound quoted there. The lower estimate in Theorem 3 gives , while the approximating subsequence in the cited construction supplies the reverse inequality, hence .
02Proofs2 reported findingsCorrect
The note's optimization and exponent substitutions are correct; its external inputs are explicitly identified as previously proved results.
The minimax reduction has the correct admissible ranges
Page 2 · equation (5) · arXiv:1201.4232v2
Jarnik's inequality gives the lower endpoint for the relation between ordinary and uniform exponents. For fixed , the two monomials in move in opposite directions, so the minimum is optimized at their intersection or an endpoint. Those alternatives give exactly the two formulas stated after the partition of .
The classical implications are used in the correct direction
Pages 1-2 · equations (1)-(2) · arXiv:1201.4232v2
Taking the minimum of the two terms in Schmidt's bound yields at the fixed point. The same argument with uniform rather than liminf control gives ; no interchange of ordinary and uniform quantifiers is made.
03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings
No non-novelty findings.