arXiv:1111.0163v5

S-adic version of Minkowski's geometry of numbers and Mahler's compactness criterion

Dmitry Kleinbock, Ronggang Shi, George Tomanov

math.DS

Abstract

In this note we give a detailed proof of certain results on geometry of numbers in the SS-adic case. These results are well-known to experts, so the aim here is to provide a convenient reference for the people who need to use them.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v5

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 19, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsCorrect

The S-adic Mahler compactness criterion and Minkowski-type bounds for successive minima are correct with the stated module and covolume hypotheses.

Theorem 1.1Correct

The S-adic compactness criterion is correct

Pages 2 and 10–12 · Theorem 1.1 · arXiv:1111.0163v5

Uniform exclusion of nonzero vectors from a fixed product neighborhood is necessary and sufficient for relative compactness in the quotient. The module normalization and the contribution from every place are retained in both directions.

Full paper, version 5
Theorems 1.2 and 4.4Correct

The successive-minima product bounds are correct

Pages 2–3 and 8–10 · Minkowski-type theorems · arXiv:1111.0163v5

The product of successive minima is bounded above and below by constants depending only on the ambient S-adic data times the covolume. The statement correctly accommodates nonprincipal modules through the ideal-class reduction.

02Proofs2 reported findingsCorrect

The ideal-class reduction, volume estimates, and compactness argument are correct and complete.

Proof of the Minkowski theoremCorrect and complete

The local-volume and module-index factors balance correctly

Pages 5–10 · proof culminating in Theorem 4.4 · arXiv:1111.0163v5

The adelic convex body is compared with a fundamental region, successive independent vectors are selected in order, and the finite ideal-class decomposition gives uniform constants. No place or rank case is omitted.

Proof of Theorem 1.1Correct and complete

Mahler compactness follows in both directions

Pages 10–12 · proof of Theorem 1.1 · arXiv:1111.0163v5

A convergent family cannot acquire a nonzero vector tending to zero, while the lower bound on the first minimum and the covolume normalization bound all successive minima. A bounded choice of bases then yields a convergent subsequence in the quotient.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:1111.0163v5
Authors listed
Dmitry Kleinbock, Ronggang Shi, George Tomanov
Audit date
August 19, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.