arXiv:1004.4269v1
Abstract
We give a simplified exposition of the easiest case of a breakthrough result by D.Badziahin, A.Pollington and S.Velani related to W.M.Schmidt's conjecture.
AI-generated audit
Audit summary
Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.
Current report
Detailed mathematical audit
01Statements1 reported findingCorrect
The explicit vertical-line instance of the Badziahin–Pollington–Velani construction is correct.
Uniform avoidance of all rational-line intervals
Page 2 · Proposition 1 · arXiv:1004.4269v1
Under and , the nested construction produces satisfying for every nonzero integer pair . The case is exactly the hypothesis, while is covered by the forbidden intervals.
02Proofs3 reported findingsCorrect
The concurrency lemmas, deletion counts, and final nested-interval estimate correctly prove Proposition 1.
Bounded-slope line families
Pages 5–14 · Lemmas 1–9 and Fundamental Lemma 1 · arXiv:1004.4269v1
The determinant argument forces all admissible lines meeting one construction interval through a single rational point. The Diophantine lower bound on then supplies the required denominator estimate, and the resulting cluster length plus the single exceptional line deletes at most the stated children.
Large-slope decomposition
Pages 14–20 · modified lemmas and Fundamental Lemma 2 · arXiv:1004.4269v1
The parameter partitions every remaining height regime. Lemma again gives concurrency, the lower bound for the rational denominator controls the common cluster, and the principal family, exceptional line, and lines whose forbidden intervals barely reach the parent interval together remove at most children.
Positive branching and nonempty intersection
Pages 20–21 · proof of Proposition 1 · arXiv:1004.4269v1
Induction with bounds the delayed losses by a convergent geometric tail and yields . The finite unions are nested compact sets, so their intersection is nonempty. With , the assumed is strictly below the auxiliary bound required in Section 4.
03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings
No non-novelty findings.