arXiv:1001.0318v3

Schmidt's game, fractals, and orbits of toral endomorphisms

Ryan Broderick, Lior Fishman, Dmitry Kleinbock

math.DSmath.NT37D3037A4511J20

Abstract

Given an integer nonsingular n×nn\times n matrix MM and a point yRn/Zny \in \mathbb{R}^n/\mathbb{Z}^n, consider the set E~(M,y)\tilde E(M,y) of vectors xRnx\in \mathbb{R}^n such that yy is not a limit point of the sequence {MkxmodZn:kN}\{M^k x \mod \mathbb{Z}^n: k\in\mathbb{N}\}. S.G. Dani showed in 1988 that whenever MM is semisimple and yQn/Zny \in \mathbb{Q}^n/\mathbb{Z}^n, the set E~(M,y)\tilde E(M,y) has full Hausdorff dimension. In this paper we strengthen this result, extending it to arbitrary yRn/Zny \in \mathbb{R}^n/\mathbb{Z}^n and integer nonsingular MM, and in fact replacing the sequence of powers of MM by any lacunary sequence of (not necessarily integer) m×nm\times n matrices. Furthermore, we show that sets of the form E~(M,y)\tilde E(M,y) and their generalizations always intersect with `sufficiently regular' fractal subsets of Rn\mathbb{R}^n. As an application we give an alternative proof of a recent result of Einsiedler and Tseng on badly approximable systems of affine forms.

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against arXiv v3

Not a correctness certificate. A “Correct” result may include yellow typos or minor formal corrections that do not affect substantive soundness. It means this audit found no unresolved substantive error under the stated criteria; it does not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Current report

Detailed mathematical audit

Generated August 19, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsCorrect

The winning and incompressibility results for lacunary matrix sequences, toral endomorphism orbits, and absolutely decaying fractals are correct; the lacunarity definition contains a harmless subscript typo.

Theorems 1.2 and 1.3Correct

The orbit-avoidance sets have the stated winning and dimension properties

Pages 2–5 · Theorems 1.2–1.3 · arXiv:1001.0318v3

Uniform discreteness of the targets and lacunary growth of the operator norms reduce each scale to finitely many hyperplane neighborhoods. Absolute decay guarantees a legal move avoiding them, yielding winning on the support and the stated full-dimension intersection conclusions.

Full paper, version 3
Definition of lacunarityTypo · no status impact

Powers should be subscripts in the consecutive-term ratio

Page 3 · lacunary-sequence definition · arXiv:1001.0318v3

The displayed definition writes consecutive sequence entries as powers. The proof consistently uses the ratio of the entry with index j plus one to the entry with index j. Replacing the two powers by subscripts uniquely restores the intended standard definition.

02Proofs2 reported findingsCorrect

The lacunary-scale strategy, absolute-decay estimates, and countable-intersection deductions are correct and complete.

Theorem 4.1Correct and complete after the notation correction

The abstract lacunary avoidance argument is complete

Pages 8–12 · Theorem 4.1 and proof · arXiv:1001.0318v3

Indices are grouped by operator scale, uniform discreteness bounds the number of relevant targets, and the preimages of their neighborhoods are controlled by hyperplane neighborhoods. Absolute decay then supplies a fixed winning parameter.

Corollary 1.4Correct and complete

The affine-map and fractal intersection deduction closes

Pages 5 and 12–13 · Corollary 1.4 · arXiv:1001.0318v3

The derivative hypotheses preserve the diffuse geometry locally, and the winning property survives the countable family of maps. The dimension conclusion follows from the Ahlfors-regular measure on each nonempty open piece.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo non-novelty findings

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, manuscript locations, and references.
Open report PDF ↗

Author response

Challenge an audit finding

Local workflow preview

A listed author may submit formal evidence that an audit is inaccurate. The response would be considered in a fresh AI re-evaluation; it would not edit the audit automatically.

Paper
arXiv:1001.0318v3
Authors listed
Ryan Broderick, Lior Fishman, Dmitry Kleinbock
Audit date
August 19, 2026
  1. 01Establish identityMatch an authenticated scholarly identity to this paper.
  2. 02Submit evidenceIdentify the finding and give a formal mathematical response.
  3. 03Re-evaluateA separate agent checks the response and records a disposition.
Recommended production method

Authenticate with ORCID, then require an exact arXiv match

MathAudit should accept the identity only when ORCID OAuth authenticates the claimant's iD and this exact arXiv paper appears in arXiv's public authority feed for that iD. A matching name alone is not sufficient.

ORCID OAuth and arXiv authority-record lookup are not connected in this local prototype.

Email fallback for papers without a linked ORCID

A production fallback could send a one-time link only when the submitted address matches an independently maintained author-contact allowlist for this paper. MathAudit must return the same message for every address so the form cannot reveal which contacts are on that list.

This demonstration does not send, store, or compare the address.

Structured response preview

This form remains unavailable until production identity verification succeeds. Nothing entered here is submitted.

This panel never establishes authorship in the local prototype. A production result should be described narrowly as an authenticated ORCID match or control of a separately allowlisted author-contact mailbox.