Role in dependence graphs

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against the exact journal version of record

Not a correctness certificate. These reports do not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Exact reviewed source

Exact paginated Acta Arithmetica scan hosted on the author's institutional page

Michel Waldschmidt. Approximation simultanée par des produits de puissances de nombres algébriques. Acta Arithmetica 79 (1997), no. 2, 137–162.

Open audited source ↗
Generated September 26, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsNo statement issues found

The selected simultaneous approximation lemma has the precise transference form required by the 1999 abelian-variety argument.

Lemma 3.1No issue found

The two systems of simultaneous inequalities are quantitatively equivalent

journal pp. 145–147 · Lemma 3.1

The lemma passes in both directions between the primal and dual families of linear-form inequalities with the displayed powers and constants. The dimension indices and exponent reversal agree with the Cassels transference theorem used in its proof.

Lemma 3.2No issue found

Cassels' transference theorem is restated with the needed two directions

journal pp. 145–146 · Lemma 3.2

Waldschmidt explicitly identifies this lemma with Theorem XVII of Chapter V in Cassels and separates its parts A and B. Those are exactly the directions subsequently applied in Lemma 3.1.

02Proofs1 reported findingNo proof issues found

The proof of Lemma 3.1 correctly checks the hypotheses of the represented Cassels transference theorem and propagates the constants.

Proof of Lemma 3.1Correct and complete modulo terminal book source

Both transference directions close

journal pp. 146–147

The proof applies the two halves of Lemma 3.2 to the appropriate coefficient systems and then absorbs dimension-dependent factors into the constants. No reversed inequality or missing parameter range was found. Cassels' published book is the graph's disclosed terminal source.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo novelty concerns found

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, exact locations, and sources checked.
Open report PDF ↗