Role in dependence graphs

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against the exact journal version of record

Not a correctness certificate. These reports do not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Exact reviewed source

Version of record · Časopis pro pěstování matematiky a fysiky 68 (1939), 93–102

Kurt Mahler. Ein Übertragungsprinzip für konvexe Körper. Časopis pro pěstování matematiky a fysiky 68 (1939), no. 3–4, 93–102.

Open audited source ↗
Generated September 26, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsNo statement issues found

The consecutive-minima transference theorem for a centrally symmetric convex body and its polar is correct. In particular, if σ(h)\sigma^{(h)} and τ(h)\tau^{(h)} are their successive minima, then 1≤σ(h)τ(n−h+1)≤(n!)21\leq\sigma^{(h)}\tau^{(n-h+1)}\leq(n!)^2 for every hh.

Principal transference theoremNo issue found

Each paired pair of successive minima has the claimed dimension-only bounds

Journal pages 99–101 · equations (A) and (B) · version of record

The lower bound follows because the hh selected lattice vectors for the body and the n−h+1n-h+1 selected lattice vectors for the polar cannot span orthogonal subspaces: their dimensions sum to n+1n+1. Hence one scalar product is a nonzero integer, so polarity gives 1≤σ(h)τ(n−h+1)1\leq\sigma^{(h)}\tau^{(n-h+1)}. Multiplying all paired factors and using the product bounds for the two sequences of successive minima gives the upper bound (n!)2(n!)^2. The argument has the correct index reversal and covers every 1≤h≤n1\leq h\leq n.

Czech Digital Mathematics Library scan ↗
Inhomogeneous consequenceNo issue found

The final inhomogeneous bound follows from the transference estimate

Journal pages 101–102 · §4, equations (15)–(16) · version of record

The previously established inhomogeneous covering estimate is combined with equation (B) to replace the last minimum of the primal body by the first minimum of the polar body, up to a constant depending only on dimension. The accompanying measure estimate correctly explains why the resulting exponent cannot be uniformly improved apart from such a constant.

02Proofs2 reported findingsNo proof issues found

The polar-volume comparison, product bounds for successive minima, and nonorthogonality argument form a complete proof once the explicitly cited classical Minkowski product inequalities are taken as the terminal input.

Polar-volume comparisonNo issue found in the reviewed proof

The parallelepiped–cross-polytope sandwich yields the required volume-product bounds

Journal pages 96–98 · §2, equations (6)–(9) · version of record

Supporting hyperplanes and their contact points construct an outer parallelepiped and an inner cross-polytope for each polar body. Their volumes differ by the factor n!n!, while the exact product for a polar parallelepiped and cross-polytope is 4n/n!4^n/n!. The two containments therefore give the two-sided estimate for JJ′JJ' used in §3.

Classical terminal inputCorrectly sourced terminal input

The only imported proof-critical inequalities are identified

Journal page 99 · equations (10) and (10-prime) · citation to Minkowski, Geometrie der Zahlen

Mahler explicitly invokes Minkowski's classical product inequalities for successive minima and volume. Substituting these inequalities for the body and its polar, together with the independently proved volume-product estimate, gives equation (11) with no missing algebraic step.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo novelty concerns found

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, exact locations, and sources checked.
Open report PDF ↗