Published paper
Role in dependence graphs
Proof-critical source
Khintchine-type theorems for weighted uniform inhomogeneous approximations via transference principle
This paper is included only for the following marked statement:
- Consecutive-minima transference theorem · pp. 93–102; restated as German–Evdokimov Theorem DRelates successive minima of a parallelepiped and its pseudo-compound dual.
Proof-critical source
Diophantine approximation on abelian varieties; a conjecture of M. Waldschmidt
This paper is included only for the following marked statement:
- Section 3 transference theorem · journal pp. 99–101Compares successive minima of a convex body and its compound body.
AI-generated audit
Audit summary
Not a correctness certificate. These reports do not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.
Exact reviewed source
Version of record · Časopis pro pěstování matematiky a fysiky 68 (1939), 93–102
Kurt Mahler. Ein Übertragungsprinzip für konvexe Körper. Časopis pro pěstování matematiky a fysiky 68 (1939), no. 3–4, 93–102.
Open audited source ↗01Statements2 reported findingsNo statement issues found
The consecutive-minima transference theorem for a centrally symmetric convex body and its polar is correct. In particular, if and are their successive minima, then for every .
Each paired pair of successive minima has the claimed dimension-only bounds
Journal pages 99–101 · equations (A) and (B) · version of record
The lower bound follows because the selected lattice vectors for the body and the selected lattice vectors for the polar cannot span orthogonal subspaces: their dimensions sum to . Hence one scalar product is a nonzero integer, so polarity gives . Multiplying all paired factors and using the product bounds for the two sequences of successive minima gives the upper bound . The argument has the correct index reversal and covers every .
Czech Digital Mathematics Library scan ↗The final inhomogeneous bound follows from the transference estimate
Journal pages 101–102 · §4, equations (15)–(16) · version of record
The previously established inhomogeneous covering estimate is combined with equation (B) to replace the last minimum of the primal body by the first minimum of the polar body, up to a constant depending only on dimension. The accompanying measure estimate correctly explains why the resulting exponent cannot be uniformly improved apart from such a constant.
02Proofs2 reported findingsNo proof issues found
The polar-volume comparison, product bounds for successive minima, and nonorthogonality argument form a complete proof once the explicitly cited classical Minkowski product inequalities are taken as the terminal input.
The parallelepiped–cross-polytope sandwich yields the required volume-product bounds
Journal pages 96–98 · §2, equations (6)–(9) · version of record
Supporting hyperplanes and their contact points construct an outer parallelepiped and an inner cross-polytope for each polar body. Their volumes differ by the factor , while the exact product for a polar parallelepiped and cross-polytope is . The two containments therefore give the two-sided estimate for used in §3.
The only imported proof-critical inequalities are identified
Journal page 99 · equations (10) and (10-prime) · citation to Minkowski, Geometrie der Zahlen
Mahler explicitly invokes Minkowski's classical product inequalities for successive minima and volume. Substituting these inequalities for the body and its polar, together with the independently proved volume-product estimate, gives equation (11) with no missing algebraic step.
03Novelty0 reported findingsNo novelty concerns found
No non-novelty findings.