Role in dependence graphs

AI-generated audit

Audit summary

Audited against an explicitly disclosed arXiv fallback

Not a correctness certificate. These reports do not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.

Exact reviewed source

Frozen exact arXiv:math/0405433v3 · final-manuscript fallback

Simon Kristensen, Rebecca Thorn, and Sanju Velani. Diophantine approximation and badly approximable sets. arXiv:math/0405433v3; Advances in Mathematics 203 (2006), 132–169.

The publisher landing page was available but the exact version-of-record full text was not acquired. The report therefore evaluates the authors' exact final arXiv v3 manuscript and does not claim to audit the version of record.

Open audited source ↗
Generated September 26, 2026
01Statements2 reported findingsNo statement issues found

The abstract full-dimension criteria and the advertised number-theoretic and dynamical applications are correct after a verified logical-quantifier repair in the rectangular framework. The ball-case cardinality hypothesis is a lower bound, as printed in Theorem 1.

Theorem 1No issue found

The ball framework has the correct cardinality direction and yields full dimension

arXiv:math/0405433v3 · §1.3, Theorem 1; proof through §§3–4

The retained-child hypothesis is correctly printed as the lower bound #C(θBn)≥κ1(ρ(kn)/ρ(kn+1))δ\#\mathcal C(\theta B_n)\geq\kappa_1(\rho(k^n)/\rho(k^{n+1}))^\delta. Removing at most the corresponding κ2\kappa_2 proportion leaves a uniformly branching Cantor construction because κ2<κ1\kappa_2<\kappa_1. The constructed probability measure satisfies the required Frostman estimate, so the mass distribution principle gives dimension tending to δ\delta as k→∞k\to\infty.

Exact final arXiv v3 manuscript ↗
ApplicationsNo issue found

The simplex and separation estimates verify the abstract hypotheses in the main examples

arXiv:math/0405433v3 · §5, including the simplex lemma and the real, complex, pp-adic, formal-series, IFS, rational-map, and Kleinian-group applications

In the simultaneous real case, rational points with comparable denominators in a sufficiently small convex region lie on one affine hyperplane by the determinant lower bound. Counting the next-scale rectangles meeting that hyperplane gives the required bad-child estimate. The later applications use the analogous separation or distortion estimates appropriate to their ambient spaces, with the measure-growth exponents substituted consistently into the abstract theorem.

02Proofs3 reported findingsSuspected incomplete or incorrect proofs

The Cantor-measure proof and application-specific counting arguments are sound, but the rectangular-framework proof repeatedly replaces avoidance of a product neighborhood by coordinatewise avoidance in every coordinate. That equivalence is false as written. A verified repair using an existential coordinate at each resonant set preserves every theorem and application.

Rectangular avoidance quantifierSuspected incorrect as written · an apparently sound repair

Leaving a product neighborhood requires one separated coordinate, not all coordinates

arXiv:math/0405433v3 · §2.1 after the definition of Bad⁡∗\operatorname{Bad}^*; §4, condition (C), induction, and completion of proof

For a product neighborhood Fα={x:di(xi,Rα,i)≤ρi(βα) for all i}F_\alpha=\{x:d_i(x_i,R_{\alpha,i})\leq\rho_i(\beta_\alpha)\text{ for all }i\}, the condition x∉cFαx\notin cF_\alpha means that for each α\alpha there exists at least one coordinate i=i(α)i=i(\alpha) with di(xi,Rα,i)>cρi(βα)d_i(x_i,R_{\alpha,i})>c\rho_i(\beta_\alpha). The manuscript instead states several times that the inequality holds for every coordinate. Repair each such displayed all-coordinate claim by the logically equivalent maximum condition max⁡idi(xi,Rα,i)ρi(βα)≥c.\max_i\frac{d_i(x_i,R_{\alpha,i})}{\rho_i(\beta_\alpha)}\geq c. The bad-child hypothesis already counts rectangles simultaneously close in all coordinates, so every retained child has the repaired property. For the finitely many small-height resonant sets, compactness and exclusion of their union give a positive minimum of the same maximum. The induction, dimension estimate, and all applications then proceed unchanged.

Exact final arXiv v3 manuscript ↗
Cantor measureCorrect and complete after an apparently sound repair

The lower-dimension estimate is complete after the quantifier repair

arXiv:math/0405433v3 · §§3–4, construction of Kc(k)\mathbf K_{c(k)} and the measure μ\mu

The retained rectangles have uniform branching bounded below by the difference κ1−κ2\kappa_1-\kappa_2. Equal splitting defines a probability measure. A ball at an intermediate scale meets only a controlled number of children, while the doubling and comparability hypotheses convert this count into μ(B)≪rδ−2ε(k)\mu(B)\ll r^{\delta-2\varepsilon(k)}. Since ε(k)→0\varepsilon(k)\to0, the mass distribution principle yields the claimed lower bound.

Mass distribution inputCorrectly sourced terminal input

The cited terminal principle is applied with the correct inequality

arXiv:math/0405433v3 · §3, Mass Distribution Principle; applied in §4

The source cites Falconer's Fractal Geometry, page 55, for the standard implication from a probability measure satisfying μ(B)≤crs\mu(B)\leq c r^s at small scales to dim⁡Ω≥s\dim\Omega\geq s. The constructed measure meets exactly this hypothesis.

03Novelty0 reported findingsNo novelty concerns found

No non-novelty findings.

Detailed audit reportFull reasoning, exact locations, and sources checked.
Open report PDF ↗