Published paper
Abstract
Selected proof-dependency source recorded for the bounded audit of arXiv:1501.01260v4.
Role in dependence graphs
Proof-critical source
Bernstein inequality and holonomic modules
This paper is included only for the following marked statement:
- Theorem 2.3 · arXiv:math/0310186v4, PDF p. 7Finite leaf structure.
AI-generated audit
Audit summary
Not a correctness certificate. These reports do not replace expert scrutiny or formal verification.
Exact reviewed source
Frozen exact arXiv:math/0310186v4
Symplectic singularities from the Poisson point of view
The exact versioned arXiv PDF was frozen and inspected because publisher full text was not acquired for this review. It is a fallback, not a claimed version of record.
Open audited source ↗01Statements1 reported findingSuspected unsupported statements
Selected claim text and its focal use were checked in the frozen exact versioned source. The source proofs and antecedent citations are outside this bounded first-order shell, so no selected claim is certified merely from its locator.
Claim content and focal mappingStatement located; proof closure not independently verified
Theorem 2.3
arXiv:math/0310186v4, Theorem 2.3, PDF p. 7; Focal arXiv:1501.01260v4, §2.2, PDF p. 4.
The theorem supplies the finite symplectic-leaf structure used in the conical-resolution setup. The focal translation is from the source Poisson stratification to the chosen quantized setting; no unused corollary is presented as a proof input. The audit verifies this statement-to-focal-role mapping only; it does not certify the source proof or any unexpanded antecedent.
Official arXiv:math/0310186v4 ↗02Proofs1 reported findingFurther proof verification needed
The selected proof route is bounded: the source's own proof dependencies have not been recursively closed in this audit.
Proof boundaryProof closure not independently verified
No recursive closure is claimed
Focal arXiv:1501.01260v4, §2.2, PDF p. 4.
The geometric proof chain is not expanded.
Frozen exact arXiv:math/0310186v4 ↗03Novelty0 reported findingsNo novelty concerns found
No non-novelty findings.