Proof-critical dependence graph
Twisted Diophantine Approximation I: Asymptotic Theory
Full statement-restricted proof-dependence graph for arXiv:2609.36411v1. The fixed-matrix zero-one theorem, successive-minima formulation, Lagrange and bad-target classifications, Hausdorff consequences, scalar comparison, and the full quasi-independence chain were checked. The proof-critical external branches close at Henk's lattice estimates and their terminal geometry-of-numbers background, Dani's published correspondence theorems, the general Beresnevich-Velani mass transference theorem, the exact Fuchs-Kim and Beresnevich-Haynes-Velani scalar estimates, and three terminal books for Mahler compactness, generalized Borel-Cantelli, and Hausdorff-Cantelli. Historical, motivational, comparison-only, and results fully reproved in the focal manuscript are excluded.
Graph scope10 nodes9 proof-critical linksChecked October 23, 2026
Oriented proof graph
Dependence map
Arrows point from a prerequisite toward the paper whose marked statement uses it.
- Solid arrow: headline proof lineage
- Dashed arrow: a separately marked side or appendix claim
- Dashed square: a terminal book
Hover over, or focus, a square to see its full citation.
Every visible arrow is documented in the evidence ledger below. A non-book leaf means that no earlier proof-critical source was identified for the marked statement—not that the paper has no other citations.
Evidence ledger
Proof-critical links
Henk explicitly imports the elementary lattice normalization, basis-extension, finite-index, and successive-minima span facts before proving Theorem 1.5; the same normalization is used in the Section 3 proof of Theorem 1.3. The substantive counting and volume arguments are Henk's own.
Citation location: Henk Section 2 opening paragraph and equations (2.1)–(2.2), citation [GL87]; reuse at the start of Section 3.- Theorem 1.5Upper bound for lattice points in terms of all successive minima.
- Theorem 1.3Minkowski's second theorem, used to compare covolume with the product of successive minima in a subspace.
Successive Minima and Lattice Points→Twisted Diophantine Approximation I: Asymptotic TheoryHeadline lineageSource link checked
Henk Lemma 2.1 applied to and the sublattice gives fixed-dilation control. Henk Theorem 1.5 gives the successive-minima product upper bound. Theorem 1.3 and its Section 3 proof supply Minkowski's second theorem for the covolume-product step in the focal exterior-algebra argument.
Citation location: Focal Lemma 5.1, PDF pp. 14–15, citations [22]; focal Lemma 9.1, PDF pp. 24–26; Henk Lemma 2.1, Theorems 1.3 and 1.5.- Lemma 5.1Fixed-dilation lattice count and two-sided successive-minima cube count.
- Lemma 9.1Exterior-product formula for active and arbitrary primitive sublattices.
Divergent trajectories of flows on homogeneous spaces and Diophantine approximation→Twisted Diophantine Approximation I: Asymptotic TheoryHeadline lineageSource link checked
Dani Theorem 2.14 converts nonsingularity into nondivergence of the forward lattice trajectory, the starting point of Corollary 2.4. Dani Theorem 2.20 converts bad approximability into boundedness of the same trajectory for Remark 1.5. The block conventions agree after the standard permutation/transposition identification.
Citation location: Focal Remark 1.5, PDF p. 5, and Corollary 2.4 proof, PDF p. 10, citations [18]; Dani printed pp. 63–65.- Corollary 2.4Divergence of the critical series and nullity of bad targets for nonsingular matrices.
- Remark 1.5Recovers the dyadically regular badly approximable case through the bounded-orbit correspondence.
Discrete Subgroups of Lie Groups→Twisted Diophantine Approximation I: Asymptotic TheoryHeadline lineageSource-chain endpoint
Mahler's compactness criterion turns each compact return into a uniform positive shortest-vector bound. Bounded distortion over the fixed interval between consecutive sampled flow times then gives a positive lower bound at infinitely many indices.
Citation location: Focal proof of Corollary 2.4, PDF p. 10; Raghunathan Corollary 10.9.- Corollary 2.4Divergence of the critical series and nullity of bad targets for nonsingular matrices.
A Mass Transference Principle and the Duffin–Schaeffer conjecture for Hausdorff measures→Twisted Diophantine Approximation I: Asymptotic TheoryHeadline lineageSelf-contained endpoint
Apply the general theorem with the torus in the supremum metric, , and . The transformed ball radius is , exactly the focal function ; conullity of the transformed limsup follows from Theorem 1.1.
Citation location: Focal proof of Corollary 3.1, PDF p. 11, citation [16, §6.1 Theorem 3]; source printed pp. 989–991.- Corollary 3.1Separate sufficient zero and infinity criteria for Hausdorff measure.
On Kurzweil's 0–1 Law in Inhomogeneous Diophantine Approximation→Twisted Diophantine Approximation I: Asymptotic TheoryHeadline lineageSelf-contained endpoint
The best-approximation separation bounds the number of orbit points in the short interval. More importantly, the proof of Fuchs-Kim Lemma 2.1 shows that convergence of the block-minimum series implies , exactly the residual summability needed in the reverse implication.
Citation location: Focal Proposition 4.1 proof, PDF pp. 12–14, citations [20, §2.2 and proof of Lemma 2.1]; source PDF pp. 3–8.- Proposition 4.1Equivalence of the focal dyadic series and the Fuchs-Kim block series in dimension one.
Sums of reciprocals of fractional parts and multiplicative Diophantine approximation→Twisted Diophantine Approximation I: Asymptotic TheoryHeadline lineageSelf-contained endpoint
Equation (6.9) counts the multiples for which both the denominator and approximation constraints hold. Adding the zero vector and both signs gives the focal lower bound for .
Citation location: Focal Proposition 4.1 proof, PDF p. 13, citation [5, §6.1 equation (6.9)]; source PDF p. 49.- Proposition 4.1Equivalence of the focal dyadic series and the Fuchs-Kim block series in dimension one.
Metric Theory of Diophantine Approximations→Twisted Diophantine Approximation I: Asymptotic TheoryHeadline lineageSource-chain endpoint
The generalized Borel-Cantelli lemma gives the displayed lower bound for a limsup measure in terms of finite sums of event measures and pairwise intersections; this turns Proposition 7.3 into positive measure.
Citation location: Focal Lemma 7.2 and divergent-case proof, PDF pp. 20–21, citation [42, Lemma 5].- Lemma 7.2Second-moment lower bound for the limsup measure.
Metric Diophantine Approximation on Manifolds→Twisted Diophantine Approximation I: Asymptotic TheoryHeadline lineageSource-chain endpoint
The selected triple-ball covers have diameters tending to zero, and convergence of their -power costs is exactly the hypothesis of the Hausdorff-Cantelli lemma.
Citation location: Focal convergence proof for Corollary 3.1, PDF p. 20, citation [1, Lemma 3.10].- Corollary 3.1Separate sufficient zero and infinity criteria for Hausdorff measure.